diff options
author | Daniel Baumann <daniel@debian.org> | 2024-10-18 20:33:49 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Daniel Baumann <daniel@debian.org> | 2024-12-12 23:57:56 +0100 |
commit | e68b9d00a6e05b3a941f63ffb696f91e554ac5ec (patch) | |
tree | 97775d6c13b0f416af55314eb6a89ef792474615 /models/migrations/v1_14/v176_test.go | |
parent | Initial commit. (diff) | |
download | forgejo-e68b9d00a6e05b3a941f63ffb696f91e554ac5ec.tar.xz forgejo-e68b9d00a6e05b3a941f63ffb696f91e554ac5ec.zip |
Adding upstream version 9.0.3.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Baumann <daniel@debian.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'models/migrations/v1_14/v176_test.go')
-rw-r--r-- | models/migrations/v1_14/v176_test.go | 128 |
1 files changed, 128 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/models/migrations/v1_14/v176_test.go b/models/migrations/v1_14/v176_test.go new file mode 100644 index 0000000..f5e644e --- /dev/null +++ b/models/migrations/v1_14/v176_test.go @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +// Copyright 2021 The Gitea Authors. All rights reserved. +// SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT + +package v1_14 //nolint + +import ( + "testing" + + migration_tests "code.gitea.io/gitea/models/migrations/test" + + "github.com/stretchr/testify/assert" +) + +func Test_RemoveInvalidLabels(t *testing.T) { + // Models used by the migration + type Comment struct { + ID int64 `xorm:"pk autoincr"` + Type int `xorm:"INDEX"` + IssueID int64 `xorm:"INDEX"` + LabelID int64 + ShouldRemain bool // <- Flag for testing the migration + } + + type Issue struct { + ID int64 `xorm:"pk autoincr"` + RepoID int64 `xorm:"INDEX UNIQUE(repo_index)"` + Index int64 `xorm:"UNIQUE(repo_index)"` // Index in one repository. + } + + type Repository struct { + ID int64 `xorm:"pk autoincr"` + OwnerID int64 `xorm:"UNIQUE(s) index"` + LowerName string `xorm:"UNIQUE(s) INDEX NOT NULL"` + } + + type Label struct { + ID int64 `xorm:"pk autoincr"` + RepoID int64 `xorm:"INDEX"` + OrgID int64 `xorm:"INDEX"` + } + + type IssueLabel struct { + ID int64 `xorm:"pk autoincr"` + IssueID int64 `xorm:"UNIQUE(s)"` + LabelID int64 `xorm:"UNIQUE(s)"` + ShouldRemain bool // <- Flag for testing the migration + } + + // load and prepare the test database + x, deferable := migration_tests.PrepareTestEnv(t, 0, new(Comment), new(Issue), new(Repository), new(IssueLabel), new(Label)) + if x == nil || t.Failed() { + defer deferable() + return + } + defer deferable() + + var issueLabels []*IssueLabel + ilPreMigration := map[int64]*IssueLabel{} + ilPostMigration := map[int64]*IssueLabel{} + + var comments []*Comment + comPreMigration := map[int64]*Comment{} + comPostMigration := map[int64]*Comment{} + + // Get pre migration values + if err := x.Find(&issueLabels); err != nil { + t.Errorf("Unable to find issueLabels: %v", err) + return + } + for _, issueLabel := range issueLabels { + ilPreMigration[issueLabel.ID] = issueLabel + } + if err := x.Find(&comments); err != nil { + t.Errorf("Unable to find comments: %v", err) + return + } + for _, comment := range comments { + comPreMigration[comment.ID] = comment + } + + // Run the migration + if err := RemoveInvalidLabels(x); err != nil { + t.Errorf("unable to RemoveInvalidLabels: %v", err) + } + + // Get the post migration values + issueLabels = issueLabels[:0] + if err := x.Find(&issueLabels); err != nil { + t.Errorf("Unable to find issueLabels: %v", err) + return + } + for _, issueLabel := range issueLabels { + ilPostMigration[issueLabel.ID] = issueLabel + } + comments = comments[:0] + if err := x.Find(&comments); err != nil { + t.Errorf("Unable to find comments: %v", err) + return + } + for _, comment := range comments { + comPostMigration[comment.ID] = comment + } + + // Finally test results of the migration + for id, comment := range comPreMigration { + post, ok := comPostMigration[id] + if ok { + if !comment.ShouldRemain { + t.Errorf("Comment[%d] remained but should have been deleted", id) + } + assert.Equal(t, comment, post) + } else if comment.ShouldRemain { + t.Errorf("Comment[%d] was deleted but should have remained", id) + } + } + + for id, il := range ilPreMigration { + post, ok := ilPostMigration[id] + if ok { + if !il.ShouldRemain { + t.Errorf("IssueLabel[%d] remained but should have been deleted", id) + } + assert.Equal(t, il, post) + } else if il.ShouldRemain { + t.Errorf("IssueLabel[%d] was deleted but should have remained", id) + } + } +} |