diff options
author | Daniel Baumann <daniel@debian.org> | 2024-10-18 20:33:49 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Daniel Baumann <daniel@debian.org> | 2024-12-12 23:57:56 +0100 |
commit | e68b9d00a6e05b3a941f63ffb696f91e554ac5ec (patch) | |
tree | 97775d6c13b0f416af55314eb6a89ef792474615 /web_src/css/modules/modal.css | |
parent | Initial commit. (diff) | |
download | forgejo-e68b9d00a6e05b3a941f63ffb696f91e554ac5ec.tar.xz forgejo-e68b9d00a6e05b3a941f63ffb696f91e554ac5ec.zip |
Adding upstream version 9.0.3.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Baumann <daniel@debian.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'web_src/css/modules/modal.css')
-rw-r--r-- | web_src/css/modules/modal.css | 86 |
1 files changed, 86 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/web_src/css/modules/modal.css b/web_src/css/modules/modal.css new file mode 100644 index 0000000..54a4ef8 --- /dev/null +++ b/web_src/css/modules/modal.css @@ -0,0 +1,86 @@ +.ui.modal.g-modal-confirm { + max-width: min(800px, 90vw); + width: fit-content; +} + +.ui.modal.g-modal-confirm > .inside.close.icon { + padding: 0; + width: 1em; + height: 1em; + top: 1.2em; +} + +.ui.modal > .close.icon[height="16"] { + top: 0.7em; /* fomantic uses absolute layout, so if we have special icon size, it needs this trick to align vertically */ + color: var(--color-text-dark); +} + +.ui.modal > .header { + /* can't use display:flex, because some headers have space-separated elements, eg: delete branch modal */ + color: var(--color-text-dark); + background: var(--color-body); + border-color: var(--color-secondary); + border-top-left-radius: var(--border-radius); + border-top-right-radius: var(--border-radius); + vertical-align: middle; +} + +.ui.modal > .header .svg { + vertical-align: middle; + display: inline-block; +} + +.ui.modal { + background: var(--color-body); + box-shadow: 1px 3px 3px 0 var(--color-shadow), 1px 3px 15px 2px var(--color-shadow); +} + +/* Gitea sometimes use a form in a modal dialog, then the "positive" button could submit the form directly +Fomantic UI only supports the layout: <div .modal><div .content/><div .actions/></div> +However, Gitea uses the following layouts: +* <div .modal><div .content><div .actions/></div></div> +* <div .modal><form><div .content/><div .actions/></form></div> +* <div .modal><div .content><form><div .actions/></form></div></div> +* <div .modal><div .content></div><form><div .actions/></form></div> +* ... +These inconsistent layouts should be refactored to simple ones. +*/ + +.ui.modal > .content, +.ui.modal form > .content { + padding: 1.5em; + background: var(--color-body); +} + +.ui.modal > .actions, +.ui.modal .content + .actions, +.ui.modal .content + form > .actions { + background: var(--color-secondary-bg); + border-color: var(--color-secondary); + padding: 1rem; + text-align: right; +} + +.ui.modal .content > .actions { + padding-top: 1em; /* if the "actions" is in the "content", some paddings are already added by the "content" */ + text-align: right; +} + +/* positive/negative action buttons */ +.ui.modal .actions > .ui.button { + display: inline-flex; + align-items: center; + padding: 10px 12px 10px 10px; + margin-right: 0; +} + +.ui.modal .actions > .ui.button.danger { + display: block; + width: 100%; + margin: 0 auto; + text-align: center; +} + +.ui.modal .actions > .ui.button .svg { + margin-right: 5px; +} |