diff options
| author | Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> | 2018-04-19 19:58:13 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> | 2018-05-08 09:11:00 +0200 |
| commit | 18797a3b10e4077473740b953651b0032828d0fb (patch) | |
| tree | f47ccb5234057e94b141fa106e0363d8ac8b6e1c /merge-recursive.c | |
| parent | merge-recursive: fix overwriting dirty files involved in renames (diff) | |
| download | git-18797a3b10e4077473740b953651b0032828d0fb.tar.xz git-18797a3b10e4077473740b953651b0032828d0fb.zip | |
merge-recursive: fix remaining directory rename + dirty overwrite cases
Reviewed-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'merge-recursive.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | merge-recursive.c | 25 |
1 files changed, 22 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/merge-recursive.c b/merge-recursive.c index 4fb5f797da..08c2dc094e 100644 --- a/merge-recursive.c +++ b/merge-recursive.c @@ -1324,11 +1324,22 @@ static int handle_file(struct merge_options *o, add = filespec_from_entry(&other, dst_entry, stage ^ 1); if (add) { + int ren_src_was_dirty = was_dirty(o, rename->path); char *add_name = unique_path(o, rename->path, other_branch); if (update_file(o, 0, &add->oid, add->mode, add_name)) return -1; - remove_file(o, 0, rename->path, 0); + if (ren_src_was_dirty) { + output(o, 1, _("Refusing to lose dirty file at %s"), + rename->path); + } + /* + * Because the double negatives somehow keep confusing me... + * 1) update_wd iff !ren_src_was_dirty. + * 2) no_wd iff !update_wd + * 3) so, no_wd == !!ren_src_was_dirty == ren_src_was_dirty + */ + remove_file(o, 0, rename->path, ren_src_was_dirty); dst_name = unique_path(o, rename->path, cur_branch); } else { if (dir_in_way(rename->path, !o->call_depth, 0)) { @@ -1466,7 +1477,10 @@ static int conflict_rename_rename_2to1(struct merge_options *o, char *new_path2 = unique_path(o, path, ci->branch2); output(o, 1, _("Renaming %s to %s and %s to %s instead"), a->path, new_path1, b->path, new_path2); - if (would_lose_untracked(path)) + if (was_dirty(o, path)) + output(o, 1, _("Refusing to lose dirty file at %s"), + path); + else if (would_lose_untracked(path)) /* * Only way we get here is if both renames were from * a directory rename AND user had an untracked file @@ -2075,6 +2089,7 @@ static void apply_directory_rename_modifications(struct merge_options *o, { struct string_list_item *item; int stage = (tree == a_tree ? 2 : 3); + int update_wd; /* * In all cases where we can do directory rename detection, @@ -2085,7 +2100,11 @@ static void apply_directory_rename_modifications(struct merge_options *o, * saying the file would have been overwritten), but it might * be dirty, though. */ - remove_file(o, 1, pair->two->path, 0 /* no_wd */); + update_wd = !was_dirty(o, pair->two->path); + if (!update_wd) + output(o, 1, _("Refusing to lose dirty file at %s"), + pair->two->path); + remove_file(o, 1, pair->two->path, !update_wd); /* Find or create a new re->dst_entry */ item = string_list_lookup(entries, new_path); |