diff options
author | Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> | 2020-05-09 21:23:39 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> | 2020-05-09 22:59:55 +0200 |
commit | 02471e7e205c3e6c80f7908877640c0eed526fda (patch) | |
tree | b8d26e7a1c9b54a1d61bc1a44f634e09dcce2f25 /t | |
parent | sequencer: refactor rearrange_squash() to work on a todo_list (diff) | |
download | git-02471e7e205c3e6c80f7908877640c0eed526fda.tar.xz git-02471e7e205c3e6c80f7908877640c0eed526fda.zip |
rebase --autosquash: fix a potential segfault
When rearranging the todo list so that the fixups/squashes are reordered
just after the commits they intend to fix up, we use two arrays to
maintain that list: `next` and `tail`.
The idea is that `next[i]`, if set to a non-negative value, contains the
index of the item that should be rearranged just after the `i`th item.
To avoid having to walk the entire `next` chain when appending another
fixup/squash, we also store the end of the `next` chain in `tail[i]`.
The logic we currently use to update these array items is based on the
assumption that given a fixup/squash item at index `i`, we just found
the index `i2` indicating the first item in that fixup chain.
However, as reported by Paul Ganssle, that need not be true: the special
form `fixup! <commit-hash>` is allowed to point to _another_ fixup
commit in the middle of the fixup chain.
Example:
* 0192a To fixup
* 02f12 fixup! To fixup
* 03763 fixup! To fixup
* 04ecb fixup! 02f12
Note how the fourth commit targets the second commit, which is already a
fixup that targets the first commit.
Previously, we would update `next` and `tail` under our assumption that
every `fixup!` commit would find the start of the `fixup!`/`squash!`
chain. This would lead to a segmentation fault because we would actually
end up with a `next[i]` pointing to a `fixup!` but the corresponding
`tail[i]` pointing nowhere, which would the lead to a segmentation
fault.
Let's fix this by _inserting_, rather than _appending_, the item. In
other words, if we make a given line successor of another line, we do
not simply forget any previously set successor of the latter, but make
it a successor of the former.
In the above example, at the point when we insert 04ecb just after
02f12, 03763 would already be recorded as a successor of 04ecb, and we
now "squeeze in" 04ecb.
To complete the idea, we now no longer assume that `next[i]` pointing to
a line means that `last[i]` points to a line, too. Instead, we extend
the concept of `last` to cover also partial `fixup!`/`squash!` chains,
i.e. chains starting in the middle of a larger such chain.
In the above example, after processing all lines, `last[0]`
(corresponding to 0192a) would point to 03763, which indeed is the end
of the overall `fixup!` chain, and `last[1]` (corresponding to 02f12)
would point to 04ecb (which is the last `fixup!` targeting 02f12, but it
has 03763 as successor, i.e. it is not the end of overall `fixup!`
chain).
Reported-by: Paul Ganssle <paul@ganssle.io>
Helped-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Diffstat (limited to 't')
-rwxr-xr-x | t/t3415-rebase-autosquash.sh | 16 |
1 files changed, 16 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/t/t3415-rebase-autosquash.sh b/t/t3415-rebase-autosquash.sh index 13f5688135..03983b3489 100755 --- a/t/t3415-rebase-autosquash.sh +++ b/t/t3415-rebase-autosquash.sh @@ -349,4 +349,20 @@ test_expect_success 'abort last squash' ' ! grep first actual ' +test_expect_success 'fixup a fixup' ' + echo 0to-fixup >file0 && + test_tick && + git commit -m "to-fixup" file0 && + test_tick && + git commit --squash HEAD -m X --allow-empty && + test_tick && + git commit --squash HEAD^ -m Y --allow-empty && + test_tick && + git commit -m "squash! $(git rev-parse HEAD^)" -m Z --allow-empty && + test_tick && + git commit -m "squash! $(git rev-parse HEAD^^)" -m W --allow-empty && + git rebase -ki --autosquash HEAD~5 && + test XZWY = $(git show | tr -cd W-Z) +' + test_done |