| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
When constructing an OR node, the grep.c code uses `grep_or_expr()` to
make a node, assign its kind, and set its left and right children. The
same is not done for AND nodes.
Prepare to introduce a new `grep_and_expr()` function which will share
code with the existing implementation of `grep_or_expr()` by introducing
a new function which compiles either kind of binary expression, and
reimplement `grep_or_expr()` in terms of it.
Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Move the definition of grep_not_expr() up and use this function in
compile_pattern_not() to simplify the code and reduce duplication.
Signed-off-by: René Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Move the definition of grep_or_expr() up and use this function in
compile_pattern_or() to reduce code duplication.
Signed-off-by: René Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Reported-by: Jiang Xin <worldhello.net@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
When a series of patches for a topic-B depends on having topic-A,
the workflow to prepare the topic-B branch would look like this:
$ git checkout -b topic-B main
$ git merge --no-ff --no-edit topic-A
$ git am <mbox-for-topic-B
When topic-A gets updated, recreating the first merge and rebasing
the rest of the topic-B, all on detached HEAD, is a useful
technique. After updating topic-A with its new round of patches:
$ git checkout topic-B
$ prev=$(git rev-parse 'HEAD^{/^Merge branch .topic-A. into}')
$ git checkout --detach $prev^1
$ git merge --no-ff --no-edit topic-A
$ git rebase --onto HEAD $prev @{-1}^0
$ git checkout -B @{-1}
This will
(0) check out the current topic-B.
(1) find the previous merge of topic-A into topic-B.
(2) detach the HEAD to the parent of the previous merge.
(3) merge the updated topic-A to it.
(4) reapply the patches to rebuild the rest of topic-B.
(5) update topic-B with the result.
without contaminating the reflog of topic-B too much. topic-B@{1}
is the "logically previous" state before topic-A got updated, for
example. At (4), comparison (e.g. range-diff) between HEAD and
@{-1} is a meaningful way to sanity check the result, and the same
can be done at (5) by comparing topic-B and topic-B@{1}.
But there is one glitch. The merge into the detached HEAD done in
the step (3) above gives us "Merge branch 'topic-A' into HEAD", and
does not say "into topic-B".
Teach the "--into-name=<branch>" option to "git merge" and its
underlying "git fmt-merge-message", to pretend as if we were merging
into <branch>, no matter what branch we are actually merging into,
when they prepare the merge message. The pretend name honors the
usual "into <target>" suppression mechanism, which can be seen in
the tests added here.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Patterns that contain no wildcards and don't have to be case-folded are
literal. Give this condition a name to increase the readability of the
boolean expression for enabling the option PCRE2_UTF.
Signed-off-by: René Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
compile_pcre2_pattern() currently uses the option PCRE2_UTF only for
patterns with non-ASCII characters. Patterns with ASCII wildcards can
match non-ASCII strings, though. Without that option PCRE2 mishandles
UTF-8 input, though -- it matches parts of multi-byte characters. Fix
that by using PCRE2_UTF even for ASCII-only patterns.
This is a remake of the reverted ae39ba431a (grep/pcre2: fix an edge
case concerning ascii patterns and UTF-8 data, 2021-10-15). The change
to the condition and the test are simplified and more targeted.
Original-patch-by: Hamza Mahfooz <someguy@effective-light.com>
Signed-off-by: René Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Release the strbuf containing the interpolated path after copying it to
a stack buffer and before erroring out if it's too long.
Signed-off-by: René Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
While testing some ideas in 'git repack', I ran it with '--quiet' and
discovered that some progress output was still shown. Specifically, the
output for writing the multi-pack-index showed the progress.
The 'show_progress' variable in cmd_repack() is initialized with
isatty(2) and is not modified at all by the '--quiet' flag. The
'--quiet' flag modifies the po_args.quiet option which is translated
into a '--quiet' flag for the 'git pack-objects' child process. However,
'show_progress' is used to directly send progress information to the
multi-pack-index writing logic which does not use a child process.
The fix here is to modify 'show_progress' to be false if po_opts.quiet
is true, and isatty(2) otherwise. This new expectation simplifies a
later condition that checks both.
Update the documentation to make it clear that '-q' will disable all
progress in addition to ensuring the 'git pack-objects' child process
will receive the flag.
Use 'test_terminal' to check that this works to get around the isatty(2)
check.
Helped-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Historically, we needed a single packfile in order to have reachability
bitmaps. This introduced logic that when 'git repack' had a '-b' option
that we should stop sending the '--honor-pack-keep' option to the 'git
pack-objects' child process, ensuring that we create a packfile
containing all reachable objects.
In the world of multi-pack-index bitmaps, we no longer need to repack
all objects into a single pack to have valid bitmaps. Thus, we should
continue sending the '--honor-pack-keep' flag to 'git pack-objects'.
The fix is very simple: only disable the flag when writing bitmaps but
also _not_ writing the multi-pack-index.
This opens the door to new repacking strategies that might want to keep
some historical set of objects in a stable pack-file while only
repacking more recent objects.
To test, create a new 'test_subcommand_inexact' helper that is more
flexible than 'test_subcommand'. This allows us to look for the
--honor-pack-keep flag without over-indexing on the exact set of
arguments.
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Actually use extended regexes as indicated in the comment.
Signed-off-by: René Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Add missing colon to ensure correct rendering of definition list
item. Without the proper number of colons, it renders as just another
top-level paragraph rather than a list item.
Signed-off-by: Greg Hurrell <greg@hurrell.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
The option --invert-grep is documented to filter out commits whose
messages match the --grep filters. However, it also affects the
header matches (--author, --committer), which is not intended.
Move the handling of that option to grep.c, as only the code there can
distinguish between matches in the header from those in the message
body. If --invert-grep is given then enable extended expressions (not
the regex type, we just need git grep's --not to work), negate the body
patterns and check if any of them match by piggy-backing on the
collect_hits mechanism of grep_source_1().
Collecting the matches in struct grep_opt is a bit iffy, but with
"last_shown" we have a precedent for writing state information to that
struct.
Reported-by: Dotan Cohen <dotancohen@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: René Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
The comand uses a single instance of rev_info on stack, makes a
single revision traversal and exit. Mark the resources held by the
rev_info structure with UNLEAK().
We do not do this at lower level in revision.c or cmd_log_walk(), as
a new caller of the revision traversal API can make unbounded number
of rev_info during a single run, and UNLEAK() would not a be
suitable mechanism to deal with such a caller.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Earlier we marked that this patch-id test is leak-sanitizer clean,
but if we read the test script carefully, it is merely because we
have too many invocations of commands in the "git log" family on the
upstream side of the pipe, hiding breakages from them.
Split the pipeline so that breakages from these commands can be
caught (not limited to aborts due to leak-sanitizer) and unmark
the script as not passing the test with leak-sanitizer in effect.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
RCS keywords are strings that are replaced with information from
Perforce. Examples include $Date$, $Author$, $File$, $Change$ etc.
Perforce resolves these by expanding them with their expanded values
when files are synced, but Git's data model requires these expanded
values to be converted back into their unexpanded form.
Previously, git-p4.py would implement this behaviour through the use of
regular expressions. However, the regular expression substitution was
applied using decoded strings i.e. the content of incoming commit diffs
was first decoded from bytes into UTF-8, processed with regular
expressions, then converted back to bytes.
Not only is this behaviour inefficient, but it is also a cause of a
common issue caused by text files containing invalid UTF-8 data. For
files created in Windows, CP1252 Smart Quote Characters (0x93 and 0x94)
are seen fairly frequently. These codes are invalid in UTF-8, so if the
script encountered any file containing them, on Python 2 the symbols
will be corrupted, and on Python 3 the script will fail with an
exception.
This patch replaces this decoding/encoding with bytes object regular
expressions, so that the substitution is performed directly upon the
source data with no conversions.
A test for smart quote handling has been added to the
t9810-git-p4-rcs.sh test suite.
Signed-off-by: Joel Holdsworth <jholdsworth@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
The patchRCSKeywords method creates a temporary file in which to store
the patched output data. Previously this file was opened in "w+" mode
(write and read), but the code never reads the contents of the file
while open, so it only needs to be opened in "w" mode (write-only).
Signed-off-by: Joel Holdsworth <jholdsworth@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Previously the read_lines function always decoded the result lines. In
order to improve support for non-decoded binary processing of data in
git-p4.py, this patch adds a raw option to the function that allows
decoding to be disabled.
Signed-off-by: Joel Holdsworth <jholdsworth@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Previously git-p4.py would compile one of two regular expressions for
ever RCS keyword-enabled file. This patch improves simplifies the code
by pre-compiling the two regular expressions when the script first
loads.
Signed-off-by: Joel Holdsworth <jholdsworth@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Python with statements are used to wrap the execution of a block of code
so that an object can be safely released when execution leaves the
scope.
They are desirable for improving code tidyness, and to ensure that
objects are properly destroyed even when exceptions are thrown.
Signed-off-by: Joel Holdsworth <jholdsworth@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
There are three callsites of git_prompt() helper function that ask a
"yes/no" question to the end user, but one of them in help.c that
asks if the suggested auto-correction is OK, which is given when the
user makes a possible typo in a Git subcommand name, is formatted
differently from the others.
Update the format string to make the prompt string look more
consistent.
Signed-off-by: Kashav Madan <kshvmdn@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
This option helps to record specific empty patches in the middle
of an am session, which does create empty commits only when:
1. the index has not changed
2. lacking a branch
When the index has changed, "--allow-empty" will create a non-empty
commit like passing "--continue" or "--resolved".
Signed-off-by: 徐沛文 (Aleen) <aleen42@vip.qq.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Since that the command 'git-format-patch' can include patches of
commits that emit no changes, the 'git-am' command should also
support an option, named as '--empty', to specify how to handle
those empty patches. In this commit, we have implemented three
valid options ('stop', 'drop' and 'keep').
Signed-off-by: 徐沛文 (Aleen) <aleen42@vip.qq.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
This commit has described how to use '--always' option in the command
'git-format-patch' to include patches for commits that emit no changes.
Signed-off-by: 徐沛文 (Aleen) <aleen42@vip.qq.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
The discussion for gpg.ssh.allowedSignersFile shows an example string
that contains "user1@example.com,user2@example.com". Asciidoc thinks
these are real email addresses and generates "mailto" footnotes for
them. This makes the rendered content more confusing, as it has extra
"[1]" markers:
The file consists of one or more lines of principals followed by an
ssh public key. e.g.: user1@example.com[1],user2@example.com[2]
ssh-rsa AAAAX1... See ssh-keygen(1) "ALLOWED SIGNERS" for details.
and also generates pointless notes at the end of the page:
NOTES
1. user1@example.com
mailto:user1@example.com
2. user2@example.com
mailto:user2@example.com
We can fix this by putting the example into a backtick literal block.
That inhibits the mailto generation, and as a bonus typesets the example
text in a way that sets it off from the regular prose (a tt font for
html, or bold in the roff manpage).
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
When serving a fetch, git upload-pack copies data from a git
pack-objects stdout pipe to its stdout. This commit increases the size
of the buffer used for that copying from 8192 to 65515, the maximum
sideband-64k packet size.
Previously, this buffer was allocated on the stack. Because the new
buffer size is nearly 64KB, we switch this to a heap allocation.
On GitLab.com we use GitLab's pack-objects cache which does writes of
65515 bytes. Because of the default 8KB buffer size, propagating these
cache writes requires 8 pipe reads and 8 pipe writes from
git-upload-pack, and 8 pipe reads from Gitaly (our Git RPC service).
If we increase the size of the buffer to the maximum Git packet size,
we need only 1 pipe read and 1 pipe write in git-upload-pack, and 1
pipe read in Gitaly to transfer the same amount of data. In benchmarks
with a pure fetch and 100% cache hit rate workload we are seeing CPU
utilization reductions of over 30%.
Signed-off-by: Jacob Vosmaer <jacob@gitlab.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
The previous commits marked `sparse-checkout init` as deprecated; we
can just use `set` instead here and pass it no paths.
Reviewed-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>
Reviewed-by: Victoria Dye <vdye@github.com>
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Reviewed-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>
Reviewed-by: Victoria Dye <vdye@github.com>
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
As noted in the previous commit, using separate `init` and `set` steps
with sparse-checkout result in a number of issues. The previous commits
made `set` able to handle the work of both commands, and enabled reapply
to tweak the {cone,sparse-index} settings. Update the documentation to
reflect this, and mark `init` as deprecated.
Reviewed-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>
Reviewed-by: Victoria Dye <vdye@github.com>
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Folks may want to switch to or from cone mode, or to or from a
sparse-index without changing their sparsity paths. Allow them to do so
using the reapply command.
Reviewed-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>
Reviewed-by: Victoria Dye <vdye@github.com>
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
The previously suggested workflow:
git sparse-checkout init ...
git sparse-checkout set ...
Suffered from three problems:
1) It would delete nearly all files in the first step, then
restore them in the second. That was poor performance and
forced unnecessary rebuilds.
2) The two-step process resulted in two progress bars, which
was suboptimal from a UI point of view for wrappers that
invoked both of these commands but only exposed a single
command to their end users.
3) With cone mode, the first step would delete nearly all
ignored files everywhere, because everything was considered
to be outside of the specified sparsity paths. (The user was
not allowed to specify any sparsity paths in the `init` step.)
Avoid these problems by teaching `set` to understand the extra
parameters that `init` takes and performing any necessary initialization
if not already in a sparse checkout.
Reviewed-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>
Reviewed-by: Victoria Dye <vdye@github.com>
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
`init` has some code for handling updates to either cone mode or
the sparse-index setting. We would like to be able to reuse this
elsewhere, namely in `set` and `reapply`. Split this function out,
and make it slightly more general so it can handle being called from
the new callers.
Reviewed-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>
Reviewed-by: Victoria Dye <vdye@github.com>
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
We intentionally added --stdin as an option to `sparse-checkout set`,
but didn't intend for --no-stdin to be permitted as well.
Reported-by: Victoria Dye <vdye@github.com>
Reviewed-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>
Reviewed-by: Victoria Dye <vdye@github.com>
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Most sparse-checkout subcommands (list, add, reapply) only make sense
when already in a sparse state. Add a quick check that will error out
early if this is not the case.
Also document with a comment why we do not exit early in `disable` even
when core.sparseCheckout starts as false.
Reviewed-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>
Reviewed-by: Victoria Dye <vdye@github.com>
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
sparse_checkout_set() was reused by sparse_checkout_add() with the only
difference being a single parameter being passed to that function.
However, we would like sparse_checkout_set() to do the same work that
sparse_checkout_init() does if sparse checkouts are not already enabled.
To facilitate this transition, give each mode their own copy of the
function. This does not introduce any behavioral changes; that will
come in a subsequent patch.
Reviewed-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>
Reviewed-by: Victoria Dye <vdye@github.com>
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
add_patterns_from_input() has relied on a global variable,
set_opts.use_stdin, which has been used by both the `set` and `add`
subcommands of sparse-checkout. Once we introduce an
add_opts.use_stdin, the hardcoding of set_opts.use_stdin will be
incorrect. Pass the value as function parameter instead to allow us to
make subsequent changes.
Reviewed-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>
Reviewed-by: Victoria Dye <vdye@github.com>
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Some users or scripts will pipe "git diff"
output to "git apply" when replaying diffs
or commits. In these cases, they will rely
on the return value of "git apply" to know
whether the diff was applied successfully.
However, for empty commits, "git apply" will
fail. This complicates scripts since they
have to either buffer the diff and check
its length, or run diff again with "exit-code",
essentially doing the diff twice.
Add the "--allow-empty" flag to "git apply"
which allows it to handle both empty diffs
and empty commits created by "git format-patch
--always" by doing nothing and returning 0.
Add tests for both with and without --allow-empty.
Signed-off-by: Jerry Zhang <jerry@skydio.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Replace OPT_VERBOSE with OPT_VERBOSITY.
This adds a --quiet flag to "git apply" so
the user can turn down the verbosity.
Signed-off-by: Jerry Zhang <jerry@skydio.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Because `sed` is line-oriented, for ease of implementation, when
chainlint.sed encounters an opening subshell in which the first command
is cuddled with the "(", it splits the line into two lines: one
containing only "(", and the other containing whatever follows "(".
This allows chainlint.sed to get by with a single set of regular
expressions for matching shell statements rather than having to
duplicate each expression (one set for matching non-cuddled statements,
and one set for matching cuddled statements).
However, although syntactically and semantically immaterial, this
transformation has no value to test authors and might even confuse them
into thinking that the linter is misbehaving by inserting (whitespace)
line-noise into the shell code it is validating. Moreover, it also
allows an implementation detail of chainlint.sed to seep into the
chainlint self-test "expect" files, which potentially makes it difficult
to reuse the self-tests should a more capable chainlint ever be
developed.
To address these concerns, stop splitting cuddled "(..." into two lines.
Note that, as an implementation artifact, due to sed's line-oriented
nature, this change inserts a blank line at output time just before the
"(..." line is emitted. It would be possible to suppress this blank line
but doing so would add a fair bit of complexity to chainlint.sed.
Therefore, rather than suppressing the extra blank line, the Makefile's
`check-chainlint` target which runs the chainlint self-tests is instead
modified to ignore blank lines when comparing chainlint output against
the self-test "expect" output. This is a reasonable compromise for two
reasons. First, the purpose of the chainlint self-tests is to verify
that the ?!AMP?! annotations are being correctly added; precise
whitespace is immaterial. Second, by necessity, chainlint.sed itself
already throws away all blank lines within subshells since, when
checking for a broken &&-chain, it needs to check the final _statement_
in a subshell, not the final _line_ (which might be blank), thus it has
never made any attempt to precisely reproduce blank lines in its output.
Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
When checking for broken a &&-chain, chainlint.sed knows that the final
statement in a subshell should not end with `&&`, so it takes care to
make a distinction between the final line which is an actual statement
and any lines which may be mere comments preceding the closing ')'. As
such, it swallows comment lines so that they do not interfere with the
&&-chain check.
However, since `sed` does not provide any sort of real recursion,
chainlint.sed only checks &&-chains in subshells one level deep; it
doesn't do any checking in deeper subshells or in `{...}` blocks within
subshells. Furthermore, on account of potential implementation
complexity, it doesn't check &&-chains within `case` arms.
Due to an oversight, it also doesn't swallow comments inside deep
subshells, `{...}` blocks, or `case` statements, which makes its output
inconsistent (swallowing comments in some cases but not others).
Unfortunately, this inconsistency seeps into the chainlint self-test
"expect" files, which potentially makes it difficult to reuse the
self-tests should a more capable chainlint ever be developed. Therefore,
teach chainlint.sed to consistently swallow comments in all cases.
Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
The purpose of chainlint is to highlight problems it finds in test code
by inserting annotations at the location of each problem. Arbitrarily
eliding bits of the code it is checking is not helpful, yet this is
exactly what chainlint.sed does by cavalierly and unnecessarily dropping
the here-doc operator and tag; i.e. `cat <<TAG` becomes simply `cat` in
the output. This behavior can make it more difficult for the test writer
to align the annotated output of chainlint.sed with the original test
code. Address this by retaining here-doc tags.
Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Tighten here-doc recognition to prevent it from being fooled by text
which looks like a here-doc operator but happens merely to be the
content of a string, such as this real-world case from t7201:
echo "<<<<<<< ours" &&
echo ourside &&
echo "=======" &&
echo theirside &&
echo ">>>>>>> theirs"
This problem went unnoticed because chainlint.sed is not a real parser,
but rather applies heuristics to pretend to understand shell code. In
this case, it saw what it thought was a here-doc operator (`<< ours`),
and fell off the end of the test looking for the closing tag "ours"
which it never found, thus swallowed the remainder of the test without
checking it for &&-chain breakage.
Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
According to POSIX, "<<" and "<<-" are distinct shell operators. For the
latter to be recognized, no whitespace is allowed before the "-", though
whitespace is allowed after the operator. However, the chainlint
patterns which identify here-docs are both too loose and too tight,
incorrectly allowing whitespace between "<<" and "-" but disallowing it
between "-" and the here-doc tag. Fix the patterns to better match
POSIX.
Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
chainlint.sed inserts a ">" annotation at the beginning of a line to
signal that its heuristics have identified an end-of-subshell. This was
useful as a debugging aid during development of the script, but it has
no value to test writers and might even confuse them into thinking that
the linter is misbehaving by inserting line-noise into the shell code it
is validating. Moreover, its presence also potentially makes it
difficult to reuse the chainlint self-test "expect" output should a more
capable linter ever be developed. Therefore, drop the ">" annotation.
Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
>From inception, when chainlint.sed encountered a line using semicolon to
separate commands rather than `&&`, it would insert a ?!SEMI?!
annotation at the beginning of the line rather ?!AMP?! even though the
&&-chain is also broken by the semicolon. Given a line such as:
?!SEMI?! cmd1; cmd2 &&
the ?!SEMI?! annotation makes it easier to see what the problem is than
if the output had been:
?!AMP?! cmd1; cmd2 &&
which might confuse the test author into thinking that the linter is
broken (since the line clearly ends with `&&`).
However, now that the ?!AMP?! an ?!SEMI?! annotations are inserted at
the point of breakage rather than at the beginning of the line, and
taking into account that both represent a broken &&-chain, there is
little reason to distinguish between the two. Using ?!AMP?! alone is
sufficient to point the test author at the problem. For instance, in:
cmd1; ?!AMP?! cmd2 &&
cmd3
it is clear that the &&-chain is broken between `cmd1` and `cmd2`.
Likewise, in:
cmd1 && cmd2 ?!AMP?!
cmd3
it is clear that the &&-chain is broken between `cmd2` and `cmd3`.
Finally, in:
cmd1; ?!AMP?! cmd2 ?!AMP?!
cmd3
it is clear that the &&-chain is broken between each command.
Hence, there is no longer a good reason to make a distinction between a
broken &&-chain due to a semicolon and a broken chain due to a missing
`&&` at end-of-line. Therefore, drop the ?!SEMI?! annotation and use
?!AMP?! exclusively.
Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
