summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/fetch-negotiator.c (unfollow)
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2022-02-18The sixth batchJunio C Hamano1-0/+34
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2022-02-18The fifth batchJunio C Hamano1-0/+24
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2022-02-17The fourth batchJunio C Hamano1-0/+28
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2022-02-12The third batchJunio C Hamano1-0/+19
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2022-02-10glossary: describe "worktree"Junio C Hamano1-2/+11
We have description on "per worktree ref", but "worktree" is not described in the glossary. We do have "working tree", though. Casually put, a "working tree" is what your editor and compiler interacts with. "worktree" is a mechanism to allow one or more "working tree"s to be attached to a repository and used to check out different commits and branches independently, which includes not just a "working tree" but also repository metadata like HEAD, the index to support simultaneous use of them. Historically, we used these terms interchangeably but we have been trying to use "working tree" when we mean it, instead of "worktree". Most of the existing references to "working tree" in the glossary do refer primarily to the working tree portion, except for one that said refs like HEAD and refs/bisect/* are per "working tree", but it is more precise to say they are per "worktree". Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2022-02-10t/t0015-hash.sh: remove unnecessary '\' at line endJaydeep Das1-3/+3
The `|` at line end already imples that the statement is not over. So a `\` after that is redundant. Signed-off-by: Jaydeep P Das <jaydeepjd.8914@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2022-02-09The second batch for 2.36Junio C Hamano1-1/+59
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2022-02-09midx: prevent writing a .bitmap without any objectsTaylor Blau2-0/+31
When trying to write a MIDX, we already prevent the case where there weren't any packs present, and thus we would have written an empty MIDX. But there is another "empty" case, which is more interesting, and we don't yet handle. If we try to write a MIDX which has at least one pack, but those packs together don't contain any objects, we will encounter a BUG() when trying to use the bitmap corresponding to that MIDX, like so: $ git rev-parse HEAD | git pack-objects --revs --use-bitmap-index --stdout >/dev/null BUG: pack-revindex.c:394: pack_pos_to_midx: out-of-bounds object at 0 (note that in the above reproduction, both `--use-bitmap-index` and `--stdout` are important, since without the former we won't even both to load the .bitmap, and without the latter we wont attempt pack reuse). The problem occurs when we try to discover the identity of the preferred pack to determine which range if any of existing packs we can reuse verbatim. This path is: `reuse_packfile_objects()` -> `reuse_partial_packfile_from_bitmap()` -> `midx_preferred_pack()`. #4 0x000055555575401f in pack_pos_to_midx (m=0x555555997160, pos=0) at pack-revindex.c:394 #5 0x00005555557502c8 in midx_preferred_pack (bitmap_git=0x55555599c280) at pack-bitmap.c:1431 #6 0x000055555575036c in reuse_partial_packfile_from_bitmap (bitmap_git=0x55555599c280, packfile_out=0x5555559666b0 <reuse_packfile>, entries=0x5555559666b8 <reuse_packfile_objects>, reuse_out=0x5555559666c0 <reuse_packfile_bitmap>) at pack-bitmap.c:1452 #7 0x00005555556041f6 in get_object_list_from_bitmap (revs=0x7fffffffcbf0) at builtin/pack-objects.c:3658 #8 0x000055555560465c in get_object_list (ac=2, av=0x555555997050) at builtin/pack-objects.c:3765 #9 0x0000555555605e4e in cmd_pack_objects (argc=0, argv=0x7fffffffe920, prefix=0x0) at builtin/pack-objects.c:4154 Since neither the .bitmap or MIDX stores the identity of the preferred pack, we infer it by trying to load the first object in pseudo-pack order, and then asking the MIDX which pack was chosen to represent that object. But this fails our bounds check, since there are zero objects in the MIDX to begin with, which results in the BUG(). We could catch this more carefully in `midx_preferred_pack()`, but signaling the absence of a preferred pack out to all of its callers is somewhat awkward. Instead, let's avoid writing a MIDX .bitmap without any objects altogether. We catch this case in `write_midx_internal()`, and emit a warning if the caller indicated they wanted to write a bitmap before clearing out the relevant flags. If we somehow got to write_midx_bitmap(), then we will call BUG(), but this should now be an unreachable path. Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2022-02-08completion: handle unusual characters for sparse-checkoutLessley Dennington2-13/+60
Update the __gitcomp_directories method to de-quote and handle unusual characters in directory names. Although this initially involved an attempt to re-use the logic in __git_index_files, this method removed subdirectories (e.g. folder1/0/ became folder1/), so instead new custom logic was placed directly in the __gitcomp_directories method. Note there are two tests for this new functionality - one for spaces and accents and one for backslashes and tabs. The backslashes and tabs test uses FUNNYNAMES to avoid running on Windows. This is because: 1. Backslashes are explicitly not allowed in Windows file paths. 2. Although tabs appear to be allowed when creating a file in a Windows bash shell, they actually are not renderable (and appear as empty boxes in the shell). Co-authored-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Co-authored-by: Lessley Dennington <lessleydennington@gmail.com> Helped-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Lessley Dennington <lessleydennington@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2022-02-08completion: improve sparse-checkout cone mode directory completionLessley Dennington2-17/+53
Use new __gitcomp_directories method to complete directory names in cone mode sparse-checkouts. This method addresses the caveat of poor performance in monorepos from the previous commit (by completing only one level of directories). The unusual character caveat from the previous commit will be fixed by the final commit in this series. Co-authored-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Lessley Dennington <lessleydennington@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Lessley Dennington <lessleydennington@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2022-02-08completion: address sparse-checkout issuesLessley Dennington2-8/+91
Correct multiple issues with tab completion of the git sparse-checkout command. These issues were: 1. git sparse-checkout <TAB> previously resulted in an incomplete list of subcommands (it was missing reapply and add). 2. Subcommand options were not tab-completable. 3. git sparse-checkout set <TAB> and git sparse-checkout add <TAB> showed both file names and directory names. While this may be a less surprising behavior for non-cone mode, cone mode sparse checkouts should complete only directory names. Note that while the new strategy of just using git ls-tree to complete on directory names is simple and a step in the right direction, it does have some caveats. These are: 1. Likelihood of poor performance in large monorepos (as a result of recursively completing directory names). 2. Inability to handle paths containing unusual characters. These caveats will be fixed by subsequent commits in this series. Signed-off-by: Lessley Dennington <lessleydennington@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2022-02-08t0012: verify that built-ins handle `-h` even without gitdirJohannes Schindelin1-1/+6
We just fixed a class of recently introduced bugs where calling, say, `git fetch -h` outside a repository would not show the usage but instead show an ugly `BUG` message. Let's verify that this does not regress anymore. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2022-02-08checkout/fetch/pull/pack-objects: allow `-h` outside a repositoryJohannes Schindelin4-10/+17
When we taught these commands about the sparse index, we did not account for the fact that the `cmd_*()` functions _can_ be called without a gitdir, namely when `-h` is passed to show the usage. A plausible approach to address this is to move the `prepare_repo_settings()` calls right after the `parse_options()` calls: The latter will never return when it handles `-h`, and therefore it is safe to assume that we have a `gitdir` at that point, as long as the built-in is marked with the `RUN_SETUP` flag. However, it is unfortunately not that simple. In `cmd_pack_objects()`, for example, the repo settings need to be fully populated so that the command-line options `--sparse`/`--no-sparse` can override them, not the other way round. Therefore, we choose to imitate the strategy taken in `cmd_diff()`, where we simply do not bother to prepare and initialize the repo settings unless we have a `gitdir`. This fixes https://github.com/git-for-windows/git/issues/3688 Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2022-02-07ls-remote & transport API: release "struct transport_ls_refs_options"Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason7-15/+26
Fix a memory leak in codepaths that use the "struct transport_ls_refs_options" API. Since the introduction of the struct in 39835409d10 (connect, transport: encapsulate arg in struct, 2021-02-05) the caller has been responsible for freeing it. That commit in turn migrated code originally added in 402c47d9391 (clone: send ref-prefixes when using protocol v2, 2018-07-20) and b4be74105fe (ls-remote: pass ref prefixes when requesting a remote's refs, 2018-03-15). Only some of those codepaths were releasing the allocated resources of the struct, now all of them will. Mark the "t/t5511-refspec.sh" test as passing when git is compiled with SANITIZE=leak. They'll now be listed as running under the "GIT_TEST_PASSING_SANITIZE_LEAK=true" test mode (the "linux-leaks" CI target). Previously 24/47 tests would fail. Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2022-02-07hash-object: fix a trivial leak in --pathÆvar Arnfjörð Bjarmason2-2/+8
Fix a memory leak that happened when the --path option was provided. This leak has been with us ever since the option was added in 39702431500 (add --path option to git hash-object, 2008-08-03). We can now mark "t1007-hash-object.sh" as passing when git is compiled with SANITIZE=leak. It'll now run in the the "GIT_TEST_PASSING_SANITIZE_LEAK=true" test mode (the "linux-leaks" CI target). Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2022-02-05The first batchJunio C Hamano1-3/+23
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2022-02-04t0051: use "skip_all" under !MINGW in single-test fileÆvar Arnfjörð Bjarmason1-1/+6
Have this file added in 06ba9d03e34 (t0051: test GIT_TRACE to a windows named pipe, 2018-09-11) use the same "skip_all" pattern as an existing Windows-only test added in 0e218f91c29 (mingw: unset PERL5LIB by default, 2018-10-30) uses. This way TAP consumers like "prove" will show a nice summary when the test is skipped. Instead of: $ prove t0051-windows-named-pipe.sh [...] t0051-windows-named-pipe.sh .. ok [...] We will prominently show a "skipped" notice: $ prove t0051-windows-named-pipe.sh [...] t0051-windows-named-pipe.sh ... skipped: skipping Windows-specific tests [...] This is because we are now making use of the right TAP-y way to communicate this to the consumer. I.e. skipping the whole test file, v.s. skipping individual tests (in this case there's only one test). Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2022-02-04branch.c: use 'goto cleanup' in setup_tracking() to fix memory leaksGlen Choo1-3/+4
Signed-off-by: Glen Choo <chooglen@google.com> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2022-02-04branch: add --recurse-submodules option for branch creationGlen Choo14-20/+694
To improve the submodules UX, we would like to teach Git to handle branches in submodules. Start this process by teaching "git branch" the --recurse-submodules option so that "git branch --recurse-submodules topic" will create the `topic` branch in the superproject and its submodules. Although this commit does not introduce breaking changes, it does not work well with existing --recurse-submodules commands because "git branch --recurse-submodules" writes to the submodule ref store, but most commands only consider the superproject gitlink and ignore the submodule ref store. For example, "git checkout --recurse-submodules" will check out the commits in the superproject gitlinks (and put the submodules in detached HEAD) instead of checking out the submodule branches. Because of this, this commit introduces a new configuration value, `submodule.propagateBranches`. The plan is for Git commands to prioritize submodule ref store information over superproject gitlinks if this value is true. Because "git branch --recurse-submodules" writes to submodule ref stores, for the sake of clarity, it will not function unless this configuration value is set. This commit also includes changes that support working with submodules from a superproject commit because "branch --recurse-submodules" (and future commands) need to read .gitmodules and gitlinks from the superproject commit, but submodules are typically read from the filesystem's .gitmodules and the index's gitlinks. These changes are: * add a submodules_of_tree() helper that gives the relevant information of an in-tree submodule (e.g. path and oid) and initializes the repository * add is_tree_submodule_active() by adding a treeish_name parameter to is_submodule_active() * add the "submoduleNotUpdated" advice to advise users to update the submodules in their trees Incidentally, fix an incorrect usage string that combined the 'list' usage of git branch (-l) with the 'create' usage; this string has been incorrect since its inception, a8dfd5eac4 (Make builtin-branch.c use parse_options., 2007-10-07). Helped-by: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com> Signed-off-by: Glen Choo <chooglen@google.com> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2022-02-03doc: check-ignore: code-quote an exclamation markPhilip Oakley1-2/+2
The plain quoted exclamation mark renders as italics in the Windows pdf help manual. Fix this with back-tick quoting and surrounding double quotes as exemplified by the gitignore.txt guide. While at it, fix the surrounding double quotes for the other special characters usages. Signed-off-by: Philip Oakley <philipoakley@iee.email> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2022-02-02fix typo in git-mktree.txtLiginity Lee1-1/+1
fix a typo: change "as" to "a". Signed-off-by: Liginity Lee <liginity@outlook.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2022-02-02completion: add a GIT_COMPLETION_SHOW_ALL_COMMANDSÆvar Arnfjörð Bjarmason2-1/+43
Add a GIT_COMPLETION_SHOW_ALL_COMMANDS=1 configuration setting to go with the existing GIT_COMPLETION_SHOW_ALL=1 added in c099f579b98 (completion: add GIT_COMPLETION_SHOW_ALL env var, 2020-08-19). This will include plumbing commands such as "cat-file" in "git <TAB>" and "git c<TAB>" completion. Without/with this I have 134 and 243 completion with git <TAB>, respectively. It was already possible to do this by tweaking GIT_TESTING_PORCELAIN_COMMAND_LIST= from the outside, that testing variable was added in 84a97131065 (completion: let git provide the completable command list, 2018-05-20). Doing this before loading git-completion.bash worked: export GIT_TESTING_PORCELAIN_COMMAND_LIST="$(git --list-cmds=builtins,main,list-mainporcelain,others,nohelpers,alias,list-complete,config)" But such testing variables are not meant to be used from the outside, and we make no guarantees that those internal won't change. So let's expose this as a dedicated configuration knob. It would be better to teach --list-cmds=* a new category which would include all of these groups, but that's a larger change that we can leave for some other time. 1. https://lore.kernel.org/git/CAGP6POJ9gwp+t-eP3TPkivBLLbNb2+qj=61Mehcj=1BgrVOSLA@mail.gmail.com/ Reported-by: Hongyi Zhao <hongyi.zhao@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2022-02-02completion tests: re-source git-completion.bash in a subshellÆvar Arnfjörð Bjarmason1-21/+29
Change tests of git-completion.bash that re-source it to do so inside a subshell. Re-sourcing it will clobber variables it sets, and in the case of the "GIT_COMPLETION_SHOW_ALL=1" test added in ca2d62b7879 (parse-options: don't complete option aliases by default, 2021-07-16) change the behavior of the completion persistently. Aside from the addition of "(" and ")" on new lines this is an indentation-only change, only the "(" and ")" lines are changed under "git diff -w". So let's change that test, and for good measure do the same for the three tests that precede it, which were added in 8b0eaa41f23 (completion: clear cached --options when sourcing the completion script, 2018-03-22). The may not be wrong, but doing this establishes a more reliable pattern for future tests, which might use these as a template to copy. Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2022-02-02t/lib-read-tree-m-3way: indent with tabsShaoxuan Yuan1-48/+48
As Documentation/CodingGuidelines says, our shell scripts (including tests) are to use HT for indentation, but this script uses 4-column indent with SP. Fix this. Signed-off-by: Shaoxuan Yuan <shaoxuan.yuan02@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2022-02-02t/lib-read-tree-m-3way: modernize styleShaoxuan Yuan1-77/+77
Many invocations of the test_expect_success command in this file are written in old style where the command, an optional prerequisite, and the test title are written on separate lines, and the executable script string begins on its own line, and these lines are pasted together with backslashes as necessary. An invocation of the test_expect_success command in modern test scripts however writes the prerequisite and the title on the same line as the test_expect_success command itself, and ends the line with a single quote that begins the executable script string. Update the style for uniformity. Signed-off-by: Shaoxuan Yuan <shaoxuan.yuan02@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2022-02-02builtin/diff.c: fix "git-diff" usage string typoShaoxuan Yuan1-3/+3
Remove mistaken right square brackets from "git-diff" usage string. Make the usage string conform to "git-diff" documentation (Documentation/git-diff.txt). Signed-off-by: Shaoxuan Yuan <shaoxuan.yuan02@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2022-02-02patch-id: fix scan_hunk_header on diffs with 1 line of before/afterJerry Zhang2-3/+37
Normally diffs will contain a hunk header of the format "@@ -2,2 +2,15 @@ code". However when there is only 1 line of change, the unified diff format allows for the second comma separated value to be omitted in either before or after line counts. This can produce hunk headers that look like "@@ -2 +2,18 @@ code" or "@@ -2,2 +2 @@ code". As a result, scan_hunk_header mistakenly returns the line number as line count, which then results in unpredictable parsing errors with the rest of the patch, including giving multiple lines of output for a single commit. Fix by explicitly setting line count to 1 when there is no comma, and add a test. apply.c contains this same logic except it is correct. A worthwhile future project might be to unify these two diff parsers so they both benefit from fixes. Signed-off-by: Jerry Zhang <jerry@skydio.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2022-02-02patch-id: fix antipatterns in testsJerry Zhang1-33/+31
Clean up the tests for patch-id by moving file preparation tasks inside the test body and redirecting files directly into stdin instead of using 'cat'. Signed-off-by: Jerry Zhang <jerry@skydio.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2022-02-02diff-merges: avoid history simplifications when diffing mergesElijah Newren2-1/+59
Doing diffs for merges are special; they should typically avoid history simplification. For example, with git log --diff-merges=first-parent -- path the default history simplification would remove merge commits from consideration if the file "path" matched the second parent. That is counter to what the user wants when looking for first-parent diffs. Similar comments can be made for --diff-merges=separate (which diffs against both parents) and --diff-merges=remerge (which diffs against a remerge of the merge commit). However, history simplification still makes sense if not doing diffing merges, and it also makes sense for the combined and dense-combined forms of diffing merges (because both of those are defined to only show a diff when the merge result at the relevant paths differs from *both* parents). So, for separate, first-parent, and remerge styles of diff-merges, turn off history simplification. Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2022-02-02merge-ort: mark conflict/warning messages from inner merges as omittableElijah Newren1-1/+3
A recursive merge involves merging the merge bases of the two branches being merged. Such an inner merge can itself generate conflict notices. While such notices may be useful when initially trying to create a merge, they seem to just be noise when investigating merges later with --remerge-diff. (Especially when both sides of the outer merge resolved the conflict the same way leading to no overall conflict.) Remove them. Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2022-02-02show, log: include conflict/warning messages in --remerge-diff headersElijah Newren4-0/+206
Conflicts such as modify/delete, rename/rename, or file/directory are not representable via content conflict markers, and the normal output messages notifying users about these were dropped with --remerge-diff. While we don't want these messages randomly shown before the commit and diff headers, we do want them to still be shown; include them as part of the diff headers instead. Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2022-02-02diff: add ability to insert additional headers for pathsElijah Newren3-6/+123
When additional headers are provided, we need to * add diff_filepairs to diff_queued_diff for each paths in the additional headers map which, unless that path is part of another diff_filepair already found in diff_queued_diff * format the headers (colorization, line_prefix for --graph) * make sure the various codepaths that attempt to return early if there are "no changes" take into account the headers that need to be shown. Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2022-02-02merge-ort: format messages slightly different for use in headersElijah Newren3-2/+46
When users run git show --remerge-diff $MERGE_COMMIT or git log -p --remerge-diff ... stdout is not an appropriate location to dump conflict messages, but we do want to provide them to users. We will include them in the diff headers instead...but for that to work, we need for any multiline messages to replace newlines with both a newline and a space. Add a new flag to signal when we want these messages modified in such a fashion, and use it in path_msg() to modify these messages this way. Also, allow a special prefix to be specified for these headers. Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2022-02-02merge-ort: mark a few more conflict messages as omittableElijah Newren1-2/+2
path_msg() has the ability to mark messages as omittable, designed for remerge-diff where we'll instead be showing conflict messages as diff headers for a subsequent diff. While all these messages are very useful when trying to create a merge initially, early use with the --remerge-diff feature (the only user of this omittable conflict message capability), suggests that the particular messages marked in this commit are just noise when trying to see what changes users made to create a merge commit. Mark them as omittable. Note that there were already a few messages marked as omittable in merge-ort when doing a remerge-diff, because the development of --remerge-diff preceded the upstreaming of merge-ort and I was trying to ensure merge-ort could handle all the necessary requirements. See commit c5a6f65527 ("merge-ort: add modify/delete handling and delayed output processing", 2020-12-03) for the initial details. For some examples of already-marked-as-omittable messages, see either "Auto-merging <path>" or some of the submodule update hints. This commit just adds two more messages that should also be omittable. Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2022-02-02merge-ort: capture and print ll-merge warnings in our preferred fashionElijah Newren3-6/+17
Instead of immediately printing ll-merge warnings to stderr, we save them in our output strbuf. Besides allowing us to move these warnings to a special file for --remerge-diff, this has two other benefits for regular merges done by merge-ort: * The deferral of messages ensures we can print all messages about any given path together (merge-recursive was known to sometimes intersperse messages about other paths, particularly when renames were involved). * The deferral of messages means we can avoid printing spurious conflict messages when we just end up aborting due to local user modifications in the way. (In contrast to merge-recursive.c which prematurely checks for local modifications in the way via unpack_trees() and gets the check wrong both in terms of false positives and false negatives relative to renames, merge-ort does not perform the local modifications in the way check until the checkout() step after the full merge has been computed.) Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2022-02-02ll-merge: make callers responsible for showing warningsElijah Newren9-32/+63
Since some callers may want to send warning messages to somewhere other than stdout/stderr, stop printing "warning: Cannot merge binary files" from ll-merge and instead modify the return status of ll_merge() to indicate when a merge of binary files has occurred. Message printing probably does not belong in a "low-level merge" anyway. This commit continues printing the message as-is, just from the callers instead of within ll_merge(). Future changes will start handling the message differently in the merge-ort codepath. There was one special case here: the callers in rerere.c do NOT check for and print such a message; since those code paths explicitly skip over binary files, there is no reason to check for a return status of LL_MERGE_BINARY_CONFLICT or print the related message. Note that my methodology included first modifying ll_merge() to return a struct, so that the compiler would catch all the callers for me and ensure I had modified all of them. After modifying all of them, I then changed the struct to an enum. Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2022-02-02log: clean unneeded objects during `log --remerge-diff`Elijah Newren5-7/+28
The --remerge-diff option will need to create new blobs and trees representing the "automatic merge" state. If one is traversing a long project history, one can easily get hundreds of thousands of loose objects generated during `log --remerge-diff`. However, none of those loose objects are needed after we have completed our diff operation; they can be summarily deleted. Add a new helper function to tmp_objdir to discard all the contained objects, and call it after each merge is handled. Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2022-02-02show, log: provide a --remerge-diff capabilityElijah Newren6-2/+191
When this option is specified, we remerge all (two parent) merge commits and diff the actual merge commit to the automatically created version, in order to show how users removed conflict markers, resolved the different conflict versions, and potentially added new changes outside of conflict regions in order to resolve semantic merge problems (or, possibly, just to hide other random changes). This capability works by creating a temporary object directory and marking it as the primary object store. This makes it so that any blobs or trees created during the automatic merge are easily removable afterwards by just deleting all objects from the temporary object directory. There are a few ways that this implementation is suboptimal: * `log --remerge-diff` becomes slow, because the temporary object directory can fill with many loose objects while running * the log output can be muddied with misplaced "warning: cannot merge binary files" messages, since ll-merge.c unconditionally writes those messages to stderr while running instead of allowing callers to manage them. * important conflict and warning messages are simply dropped; thus for conflicts like modify/delete or rename/rename or file/directory which are not representable with content conflict markers, there may be no way for a user of --remerge-diff to know that there had been a conflict which was resolved (and which possibly motivated other changes in the merge commit). * when fixing the previous issue, note that some unimportant conflict and warning messages might start being included. We should instead make sure these remain dropped. Subsequent commits will address these issues. Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2022-02-02repo-settings: rename the traditional default fetch.negotiationAlgorithmElijah Newren5-17/+21
Give the traditional default fetch.negotiationAlgorithm the name 'consecutive'. Also allow a choice of 'default' to have Git decide between the choices (currently, picking 'skipping' if feature.experimental is true and 'consecutive' otherwise). Update the documentation accordingly. Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2022-02-02repo-settings: fix error handling for unknown valuesElijah Newren2-0/+9
In commit af3a67de01 ("negotiator: unknown fetch.negotiationAlgorithm should error out", 2018-08-01), error handling for an unknown fetch.negotiationAlgorithm was added with the code die()ing. This was also added to the documentation for the fetch.negotiationAlgorithm option, to make it explicit that the code would die on unknown values. This behavior was lost with commit aaf633c2ad ("repo-settings: create feature.experimental setting", 2019-08-13). Restore it so that the behavior again matches the documentation. Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2022-02-02repo-settings: fix checking for fetch.negotiationAlgorithm=defaultElijah Newren2-3/+16
In commit 3050b6dfc75d (repo-settings.c: simplify the setup, 2021-09-21), the branch for handling fetch.negotiationAlgorithm=default was deleted. Since this value is documented in Documentation/config/fetch.txt, restore the check for this value. Note that this change caused an observable bug: if someone sets feature.experimental=true in config, and then passes "-c fetch.negotiationAlgorithm=default" on the command line in an attempt to override the config, then the override is ignored. Fix the bug by not ignoring the value of "default". Technically, before commit 3050b6dfc75d, repo-settings would treat any fetch.negotiationAlgorithm value other than "skipping" or "noop" as a request for "default", but I think it probably makes more sense to ignore such broken requests and leave fetch.negotiationAlgorithm with the default value rather than the value of "default". (If that sounds confusing, note that "default" is usually the default value, but when feature.experimental=true, "skipping" is the default value.) Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2022-02-02perl Git.pm: don't ignore signalled failure in _cmd_close()Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason5-6/+19
Fix misbehavior in Git.pm that dates back to the very first version of the library in git.git added in b1edc53d062 (Introduce Git.pm (v4), 2006-06-24). When we fail to execute a command we shouldn't ignore all signals, those can happen e.g. if abort() is called, or if the command segfaults. Because of this we'd consider e.g. a command that died due to LSAN exiting with abort() successful, as is the case with the tests listed as running successfully with SANITIZE=leak in 9081a421a6d (checkout: fix "branch info" memory leaks, 2021-11-16). We did run them successfully, but only because we ignored these errors. This was then made worse by the use of "abort_on_error=1" for LSAN added in 85b81b35ff9 (test-lib: set LSAN_OPTIONS to abort by default, 2017-09-05). Doing that makes sense, but without providing that option we'd have a "$? >> 8" of "23" on failure, with abort_on_error=1 we'll get "0". All of our tests pass even without the SIGPIPE exception being added here, but as the code appears to have been trying to ignore it let's keep ignoring it for now. Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2022-02-01receive-pack: purge temporary data if no command is ready to runChen Bojun2-0/+17
When pushing a hidden ref, e.g.: $ git push origin HEAD:refs/hidden/foo "receive-pack" will reject our request with an error message like this: ! [remote rejected] HEAD -> refs/hidden/foo (deny updating a hidden ref) The remote side ("git-receive-pack") will not create the hidden ref as expected, but the pack file sent by "git-send-pack" is left inside the remote repository. I.e. the quarantine directory is not purged as it should be. Add a checkpoint before calling "tmp_objdir_migrate()" and after calling the "pre-receive" hook to purge that temporary data in the quarantine area when there is no command ready to run. The reason we do not add the checkpoint before the "pre-receive" hook, but after it, is that the "pre-receive" hook is called with a switch-off "skip_broken" flag, and all commands, even broken ones, should be fed by calling "feed_receive_hook()". Add a new test case in t5516 as well. Helped-by: Jiang Xin <zhiyou.jx@alibaba-inc.com> Helped-by: Teng Long <dyroneteng@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Chen Bojun <bojun.cbj@alibaba-inc.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2022-02-01builtin/branch: consolidate action-picking logic in cmd_branch()Glen Choo1-8/+11
Consolidate the logic for deciding when to create a new branch in cmd_branch(), and save the result for reuse. Besides making the function more explicit, this allows us to validate options that can only be used when creating a branch. Such an option does not exist yet, but one will be introduced in a subsequent commit. Helped-by: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com> Signed-off-by: Glen Choo <chooglen@google.com> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2022-02-01branch: add a dry_run parameter to create_branch()Glen Choo4-4/+11
Add a dry_run parameter to create_branch() such that dry_run = 1 will validate a new branch without trying to create it. This will be used in `git branch --recurse-submodules` to ensure that the new branch can be created in all submodules. Signed-off-by: Glen Choo <chooglen@google.com> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2022-02-01branch: make create_branch() always create a branchGlen Choo3-32/+46
With the previous commit, there are no more invocations of create_branch() that do not create a branch because: * BRANCH_TRACK_OVERRIDE is no longer passed * clobber_head_ok = true and force = false is never passed Assert these situations, delete dead code and ensure that we're handling clobber_head_ok and force correctly by introducing tests for `git branch --force`. As a result, create_branch() now always creates a branch. Helped-by: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com> Signed-off-by: Glen Choo <chooglen@google.com> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2022-02-01branch: move --set-upstream-to behavior to dwim_and_setup_tracking()Glen Choo3-26/+92
This commit is preparation for a future commit that will simplify create_branch() so that it always creates a branch. This will allow create_branch() to accept a dry_run parameter (which is needed for "git branch --recurse-submodules"). create_branch() used to always create a branch, but 4fc5006676 (Add branch --set-upstream, 2010-01-18) changed it to also be able to set tracking information without creating a branch. Refactor the code that sets tracking information into its own functions dwim_branch_start() and dwim_and_setup_tracking(). Also change an invocation of create_branch() in cmd_branch() in builtin/branch.c to use dwim_and_setup_tracking(), since that invocation is only for setting tracking information (in "git branch --set-upstream-to"). As of this commit, create_branch() is no longer invoked in a way that does not create branches. Helped-by: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com> Signed-off-by: Glen Choo <chooglen@google.com> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2022-02-01subtree: force merge commitThomas Koutcher1-2/+2
When `merge.ff` is set to `only` in .gitconfig, `git subtree pull` will fail with error `fatal: Not possible to fast-forward, aborting.`, but the command does want to make merges in these places. Add `--no-ff` argument to `git merge` to enforce this behaviour. Signed-off-by: Thomas Koutcher <thomas.koutcher@online.fr> Reviewed-by: Johannes Altmanninger <aclopte@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2022-02-01t5312: prepare for reftableHan-Wen Nienhuys1-5/+5
Mark some tests as REFFILES if they rely on packed refs. Use ref-store helper to create bogus refs. Signed-off-by: Han-Wen Nienhuys <hanwen@google.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2022-02-01t1405: mark test that checks existence as REFFILESHan-Wen Nienhuys1-1/+1
The reftable backend doesn't support mere existence of reflogs. Signed-off-by: Han-Wen Nienhuys <hanwen@google.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>