| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
Despite forbidden by CodingGuidelines, our usage of 'grep -E' has been
increased over the years, and noone has come and complained.
Let's lift the restriction.
Signed-off-by: Đoàn Trần Công Danh <congdanhqx@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
On Cygwin, when failing to spawn a process using start_command, Git
outputs the same error as on Linux systems, rather than using the
GIT_WINDOWS_NATIVE-specific error output. The WINDOWS test prerequisite
is set in both Cygwin and native Windows environments, which means it's
not appropriate to use to anticipate the error output from
start_command. Instead, use the MINGW test prerequisite, which is only
set for Git in native Windows environments, and not for Cygwin.
Signed-off-by: Adam Dinwoodie <adam@dinwoodie.org>
Helped-by: Đoàn Trần Công Danh <congdanhqx@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
cee6cb7300 (built-in add -p: implement the "worktree" patch modes,
2019-12-21) added the worktree patch modes to the built-in add -p.
Its commit message claims to be a port of 2f0896ec3ad4 (restore:
support --patch, 2019-04-25), which did the same for the script
git-add--interactive.perl.
The script mentioned only the worktree in its prompt messages in
worktree mode, while the built-in mentions the worktree and also the
index, even though the command doesn't actually affect the index.
2c8bd8471a (checkout -p: handle new files correctly, 2020-05-27)
added new prompt messages for addition that also mention the index in
worktree mode in the built-in, but not in the script.
Correct these prompts to state that only the worktree will be affected.
Reported-by: David Plumpton <david.plumpton@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: René Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
As the 'master' front will soon tag a preview and then release
candidates for 2.38, it is unknown if we are going to issue another
maintenance release on the 2.37.x track, but as we have accumulated
enough material there, let's prepare a draft for it.
Even if we end up not tagging 2.37.4, it would help motivated distro
packagers to maintain their slightly older and "more stable" versions.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
When `chainlint.pl` detects problems in a test definition, it emits the
test definition with "?!FOO?!" annotations highlighting the problems it
discovered. For instance, given this problematic test:
test_expect_success 'discombobulate frobnitz' '
git frob babble &&
(echo balderdash; echo gnabgib) >expect &&
for i in three two one
do
git nitfol $i
done >actual
test_cmp expect actual
'
chainlint.pl will output:
# chainlint: t1234-confusing.sh
# chainlint: discombobulate frobnitz
git frob babble &&
(echo balderdash ; ?!AMP?! echo gnabgib) >expect &&
for i in three two one
do
git nitfol $i ?!LOOP?!
done >actual ?!AMP?!
test_cmp expect actual
in which it may be difficult to spot the "?!FOO?!" annotations. The
problem is compounded when multiple tests, possibly in multiple
scripts, fail "linting", in which case it may be difficult to spot the
"# chainlint:" lines which delimit one problematic test from another.
To ameliorate this potential problem, colorize the "?!FOO?!" annotations
in order to quickly draw the test author's attention to the problem
spots, and colorize the "# chainlint:" lines to help the author identify
the name of each script and each problematic test.
Colorization is disabled automatically if output is not directed to a
terminal or if NO_COLOR environment variable is set. The implementation
is specific to Unix (it employs `tput` if available) but works equally
well in the Git for Windows development environment which emulates Unix
sufficiently.
Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Inspired by 24966cd982 ("doc: fix repeated words", 08-09-2019),
I ran "egrep -R "\<([a-zA-Z]+)\> \<\1\>" ./Documentation/*" to
find current cases of repeated words such as "the the" that were
quite clearly typos.
There were many false positives reported, such as "really really"
or valid uses of "that that" which I left alone.
Signed-off-by: Jacob Stopak <jacob@initialcommit.io>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
ce74de9(ls-files: introduce "--format" option) miss
a space between two words incorrectly, it leads to
wrong i10n messages. So fix it by adding a space at
the end of the error message.
Signed-off-by: ZheNing Hu <adlternative@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Originally, the filter_spec field was just a string pointer. In
cf9ceb5a12 (list-objects-filter-options: make filter_spec a string_list,
2019-06-27) it became a string_list, but that commit notes:
A strbuf would seem to be a more natural choice for this object, but
it unfortunately requires initialization besides just zero'ing out
the memory. This results in all container structs, and all
containers of those structs, etc., to also require initialization.
Initializing them all would be more cumbersome that simply using a
string_list, which behaves properly when its contents are zero'd.
Now that we've changed the struct to require non-zero initialization
anyway (ironically, because string_list also needed non-zero
initialization to avoid leaks), we can now convert to that more natural
type.
This makes the list_objects_filter_spec() function much less awkward, as
it had to collapse the string_list to a single-entry list on the fly.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
In 7e2619d8ff (list_objects_filter_options: plug leak of filter_spec
strings, 2022-09-08), we noted that the filter_spec string_list was
inconsistent in how it handled memory ownership of strings stored in the
list. The fix there was a bit of a band-aid to set the "strdup_strings"
variable right before adding anything.
That works OK, and it lets the users of the API continue to
zero-initialize the struct. But it makes the code a bit hard to follow
and accident-prone, as any other spots appending the filter_spec need to
think about whether to set the strdup_strings value, too (there's one
such spot in partial_clone_get_default_filter_spec(), which is probably
a possible memory leak).
So let's do that full cleanup now. We'll introduce a
LIST_OBJECTS_FILTER_INIT macro and matching function, and use them as
appropriate (though it is for the "_options" struct, this matches the
corresponding list_objects_filter_release() function).
This is harder than it seems! Many other structs, like
git_transport_data, embed the filter struct. So they need to initialize
it themselves even if the rest of the enclosing struct is OK with
zero-initialization. I found all of the relevant spots by grepping
manually for declarations of list_objects_filter_options. And then doing
so recursively for structs which embed it, and ones which embed those,
and so on.
I'm pretty sure I got everything, but there's no change that would alert
the compiler if any topics in flight added new declarations. To catch
this case, we now double-check in the parsing function that things were
initialized as expected and BUG() if appropriate.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
When we have a remote.*.promisor config variable, we know that we're in
a partial clone. Usually there's a matching remote.*.partialclonefilter
option, which tells us which filter to use with the remote. If that
option is missing, we skip setting up the filter at all. But something
funny happens: we stick a NULL entry into the string_list storing the
text filter spec.
This is a weird state, and could possibly segfault if anybody called
called list_objects_filter_spec(), etc. In practice, nobody does,
because filter->choice will still be LOFC_DISABLED, so code generally
realizes there's no filter to use. And the string_list itself is OK,
because it starts in non-dup mode until we actually parse a filter spec.
So it blindly stores the NULL without even looking at it.
But it's probably worth avoiding this confused state. It's an accident
waiting to happen, and it will be a problem if we replace the lazy
initialization from 7e2619d8ff (list_objects_filter_options: plug leak
of filter_spec strings, 2022-09-08) with a real initialization function.
The history is a little interesting here, as the bug was introduced
during the merge resolution in 627b826834 (Merge branch
'md/list-objects-filter-combo', 2019-09-18).
The original logic comes from cac1137dc4 (list-objects: check if filter
is NULL before using, 2018-06-11), where we had a single string via
core.partialCloneFilter, and a simple NULL check was sufficient. And it
even added a test in t0410 that covers this situation.
Later, that was expanded to allow per-remote filters in fa3d1b63e8
(promisor-remote: parse remote.*.partialclonefilter, 2019-06-25). After
that commit, we get a promisor struct with a partial_clone_filter
string, which could be NULL. The commit checks only that the struct
pointer is non-NULL, which is enough. It may pass NULL to
gently_parse_list_objects_filter(), but that function is smart enough to
consider it a noop.
But in parallel, cf9ceb5a12 (list-objects-filter-options: make
filter_spec a string_list, 2019-06-27) added a new line of code: before
we call gently_parse_list_objets_filter(), we append the filter spec to
the string_list. By itself that was OK, since we'd have returned early
if the string was NULL.
When the two were merged in 627b826834, the result is that we return
early only if the struct is NULL, but not the string. And we append to
the string_list, meaning we may append NULL.
The solution is to return early if either is NULL, as it would mean we
don't have a configured filter.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
If we see an error while parsing a "combine" filter, we call
list_objects_filter_release() to free any allocated memory,
and then use memset() to return the struct to a known state. But the
release function already does that reinitializing. Doing it again is
pointless.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
A possible segfault was introduced in c08830de41 (mv: check if
<destination> is a SKIP_WORKTREE_DIR, 2022-08-09).
When running t7001 with SANITIZE=address, problem appears when running:
git mv path1/path2/ .
or
git mv directory ../
or
any <destination> that makes dest_path[0] an empty string.
The add_slash() call could segfault when path argument to it is an empty
string, because it makes an out-of-bounds read to decide if an extra
slash '/' needs to be appended to it.
As add_slash() is used to make sure that a valid pathname to a file in
the given directory can be made by appending a filename after the value
returned from it, if path is an empty string, we want to return it
as-is. The path to a file "F" in the top-level of the working tree
(i.e. path=="") is formed by appending "F" after "" (i.e. path) without
any slash in between.
So, just like the case where a non-empty path already ends with a slash,
return an empty path as-is.
Reported-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Helped-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Helped-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Helped-by: Derrick Stolee <derrickstolee@github.com>
Signed-off-by: Shaoxuan Yuan <shaoxuan.yuan02@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
After 2d893dff4c (rev-parse --parseopt: allow [*=?!] in argument hints,
2015-07-14) updated the parser, a line in parseopts's input can start
with one of the flag characters and be erroneously parsed as a opt-spec
where the short name of the option is the flag character itself and the
long name is after the end of the string. This makes Git want to
allocate SIZE_MAX bytes of memory at this line:
o->long_name = xmemdupz(sb.buf + 2, s - sb.buf - 2);
Since s and sb.buf are equal the second argument is -2 (except unsigned)
and xmemdupz allocates len + 1 bytes, ie. -1 meaning SIZE_MAX.
Avoid this by checking whether a flag character was found in the zeroth
position.
Reported-by: Ingy dot Net <ingy@ingy.net>
Signed-off-by: Øystein Walle <oystwa@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
When running "git pull" with no arguments, we'll do a default "git
fetch" and then try to merge the branch specified by the branch.*.merge
config. There's code in get_ref_map() to treat that "merge" branch as
something we want to fetch, even if it is not otherwise covered by the
default refspec.
This works fine with the v0 protocol, as the server tells us about all
of the refs, and get_ref_map() is the ultimate decider of what we fetch.
But in the v2 protocol, we send the ref-prefix extension to the server,
asking it to limit the ref advertisement. And we only tell it about the
default refspec for the remote; we don't mention the branch.*.merge
config at all.
This usually doesn't matter, because the default refspec matches
"refs/heads/*", which covers all branches. But if you explicitly use a
narrow refspec, then "git pull" on some branches may fail. The server
doesn't advertise the branch, so we don't fetch it, and "git pull"
thinks that it went away upstream.
We can fix this by including any branch.*.merge entries for the current
branch in the list of ref-prefixes we pass to the server. This only
needs to happen when using the default configured refspec (since
command-line refspecs are already added, and take precedence in deciding
what we fetch). We don't otherwise need to replicate any of the "what to
fetch" logic in get_ref_map(). These ref-prefixes are an optimization,
so it's OK if we tell the server to advertise the branch.*.merge ref,
even if we're not going to pull it. We'll just choose not to fetch it.
The test here is based on one constructed by Johannes. I modified the
branch names to trigger the ref-prefix issue (and be more descriptive),
and to confirm that "git pull" actually updated the local ref, which
should be more robust than just checking stderr.
Reported-by: Lana Deere <lana.deere@gmail.com>
Helped-by: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
This field will never be NULL; if it were, we'd segfault earlier in the
function when we unconditionally check transport->remote->fetch_tags.
Likewise, many other functions dereference it unconditionally.
This is a small simplification, but it will make things easier as we
extend this conditional in the next patch.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
We call repo_config_get_string() for fetch.negotiationAlgorithm, which
allocates a copy of the string, but we never free it.
We could add a call to free(), but there's an even simpler solution: we
don't need the string to persist beyond a few strcasecmp() calls, so we
can instead use the "_tmp" variant which gives us a const pointer to the
cached value.
We need to switch the type of "strval" to "const char *" for this to
work, which affects a similar call that checks core.untrackedCache. But
it's in the same boat! It doesn't actually need the value to persist
beyond a maybe_bool() check (though it does remember to correctly free
the string afterwards). So we can simplify it at the same time.
Note that this core.untrackedCache check arguably should be using
repo_config_get_maybe_bool(), but there are some subtle behavior
changes. E.g., it doesn't currently allow a value-less "true". Arguably
it should, but let's avoid lumping further changes in what should be a
simple leak cleanup.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
The list_objects_filter_options struct contains a string_list to store
the filter_spec. Because we allow the options struct to be
zero-initialized by callers, the string_list's strdup_strings field is
generally not set.
Because we don't want to depend on the memory lifetimes of any strings
passed in to the list-objects API, everything we add to the string_list
is duplicated (either via xstrdup(), or via strbuf_detach()). So far so
good, but now we have a problem at cleanup time: when we clear the
list, the string_list API doesn't realize that it needs to free all of
those strings, and we leak them.
One option would be to set strdup_strings right before clearing the
list. But this is tricky for two reasons:
1. There's one spot, in partial_clone_get_default_filter_spec(),
that fails to duplicate its argument. We could fix that, but...
2. We clear the list in a surprising number of places. As you might
expect, we do so in list_objects_filter_release(). But we also
clear and rewrite it in expand_list_objects_filter_spec(),
list_objects_filter_spec(), and transform_to_combine_type().
We'd have to put the same hack in all of those spots.
Instead, let's just set strdup_strings before adding anything. That lets
us drop the extra manual xstrdup() calls, fixes the spot mentioned
in (1) above that _should_ be duplicating, and future-proofs further
calls. We do have to switch the strbuf_detach() calls to use the nodup
form, but that's an easy change, and the resulting code more clearly
shows the expected ownership transfer.
This also resolves a weird inconsistency: when we make a deep copy with
list_objects_filter_copy(), it initializes the copy's filter_spec with
string_list_init_dup(). So the copy frees its string_list memory
correctly, but accidentally leaks the extra manual-xstrdup()'d strings!
There is one hiccup, though. In an ideal world, everyone would allocate
the list_objects_filter_options struct with an initializer which used
STRING_LIST_INIT_DUP under the hood. But there are a bunch of existing
callers which think that zero-initializing is good enough. We can leave
them as-is by noting that the list is always initially populated via
parse_list_objects_filter(). So we can just initialize the
strdup_strings flag there.
This is arguably a band-aid, but it works reliably. And it doesn't make
anything harder if we want to switch all the callers later to a new
LIST_OBJECTS_FILTER_INIT.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
If a user of the transport API calls transport_set_option() with
TRANS_OPT_LIST_OBJECTS_FILTER, it doesn't pass a struct, but rather a
string with the filter-spec, which the transport code then stores in its
own list_objects_filter_options struct.
When the caller is done and we call transport_disconnect(), the contents
of that filter struct are then leaked. We should release it before
freeing the transport struct.
Another way to solve this would be for transport_set_option() to pass a
pointer to the struct. But that's awkward, because there's a generic
transport-option interface that always takes a string. Plus it opens up
questions of memory lifetimes; by storing its own filter-options struct,
the transport code remains self-contained.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
When the transport code for the git protocol calls into fetch_pack(), it
has to fill out a fetch_pack_args struct that is mostly taken from the
transport options. We pass along any object-filter data by doing a
struct assignment of the list_objects_filter_options struct. But doing
so isn't safe; it contains allocated pointers in its filter_spec
string_list, which could lead to a double-free if one side mutates or
frees the string_list.
And indeed, the fetch-pack code does clear and rewrite the list via
expand_list_objects_filter_spec(), leaving the transport code with
dangling pointers.
This hasn't been a problem so far, though, because the transport code
doesn't look further at the filter struct. But it should, because in
some cases (when fetch-pack doesn't rewrite the list), it ends up
leaking the string_list.
So let's start by turning this shallow copy into a deep one, which
should let us fix the transport leak in a subsequent patch. Likewise,
we'll free the deep copy we made here when we're done with it (to avoid
leaking).
Note that it would also work to pass fetch-pack a pointer to our filter
struct, rather than a copy. But it's awkward for fetch-pack to take a
pointer in its arg struct; the actual git-fetch-pack command allocates a
fetch_pack_args struct on the stack and expects it to contain the filter
options. It could be rewritten to avoid this, but a deep copy serves our
purposes just as well.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
The purpose of our copy function is to do a deep copy of each field so
that the source and destination structs become independent. We correctly
copy the filter_spec string list, but we forgot the sparse_oid_name
field. By doing a shallow copy of the pointer, that puts us at risk for
a use-after-free if one or both of the structs is cleaned up.
I don't think this can be triggered in practice, because we tend to leak
the structs rather than actually clean them up. But this should
future-proof us for plugging those leaks.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
A recent commit (upload-pack: skip parse-object re-hashing of "want"
objects, 2022-09-06) loosened the behavior of upload-pack so that it
does not verify the sha1 of objects it receives directly via "want"
requests. The existing corruption tests in t1060 aren't affected by
this: the corruptions are blobs reachable from commits, and the client
requests the commits.
The more interesting case here is a partial clone, where the client will
directly ask for the corrupted blob when it does an on-demand fetch of
the filtered object. And that is not covered at all, so let's add a
test.
It's important here that we use the "misnamed" corruption and not
"bit-error". The latter is sufficiently corrupted that upload-pack
cannot even figure out the type of the object, so it bails identically
both before and after the recent change. But with "misnamed", with the
hash-checks enabled it sees the problem (though the error messages are a
bit confusing because of the inability to create a "struct object" to
store the flags):
error: hash mismatch d95f3ad14dee633a758d2e331151e950dd13e4ed
fatal: git upload-pack: not our ref d95f3ad14dee633a758d2e331151e950dd13e4ed
fatal: remote error: upload-pack: not our ref d95f3ad14dee633a758d2e331151e950dd13e4ed
After the change to skip the hash check, the server side happily sends
the bogus object, but the client correctly realizes that it did not get
the necessary data:
remote: Enumerating objects: 1, done.
remote: Counting objects: 100% (1/1), done.
remote: Total 1 (delta 0), reused 0 (delta 0), pack-reused 0
Receiving objects: 100% (1/1), 49 bytes | 49.00 KiB/s, done.
fatal: bad revision 'd95f3ad14dee633a758d2e331151e950dd13e4ed'
error: [...]/misnamed did not send all necessary objects
which is exactly what we expect to happen.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Since 16bb3d714d (diff --no-index: use parse_options() instead of
diff_opt_parse(), 2019-03-24) argc must be 2 if we reach the loop, i.e.
argc - 2 == 0. Remove that inconsequential term.
Signed-off-by: René Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Callers of prefix_filename() are responsible for freeing its result.
Remember the returned strings and release them to appease leak checkers.
Signed-off-by: René Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
The strbuf is small and we are about to exit, so we could leave its
cleanup to the OS. If we release it explicitly at all, however, then we
should do it on early exit as well. Move the strbuf_release call to a
new cleanup section at the end and make sure all execution paths go
through it.
Suggested-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: René Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
If the caller told us that they don't care about us checking the object
hash, then we're free to implement any optimizations that get us the
parsed value more quickly. An obvious one is to check the commit graph
before loading an object from disk. And in fact, both of the callers who
pass in this flag are already doing so before they call parse_object()!
So we can simplify those callers, as well as any possible future ones,
by moving the logic into parse_object().
There are two subtle things to note in the diff, but neither has any
impact in practice:
- it seems least-surprising here to do the graph lookup on the
git-replace'd oid, rather than the original. This is in theory a
change of behavior from the earlier code, as neither caller did a
replace lookup itself. But in practice it doesn't matter, as we
disable the commit graph entirely if there are any replace refs.
- the caller in get_reference() passes the skip_hash flag only if
revs->verify_objects isn't set, whereas it would look in the commit
graph unconditionally. In practice this should not matter as we
should disable the commit graph entirely when using verify_objects
(and that was done recently in another patch).
So this should be a pure cleanup with no behavior change.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Imagine we have a history with commit C pointing to a large blob B.
If a client asks us for C, we can generally serve both objects to them
without accessing the uncompressed contents of B. In upload-pack, we
figure out which commits we have and what the client has, and feed those
tips to pack-objects. In pack-objects, we traverse the commits and trees
(or use bitmaps!) to find the set of objects needed, but we never open
up B. When we serve it to the client, we can often pass the compressed
bytes directly from the on-disk packfile over the wire.
But if a client asks us directly for B, perhaps because they are doing
an on-demand fetch to fill in the missing blob of a partial clone, we
end up much slower. Upload-pack calls parse_object() on the oid we
receive, which opens up the object and re-checks its hash (even though
if it were a commit, we might skip this parse entirely in favor of the
commit graph!). And then we feed the oid directly to pack-objects, which
again calls parse_object() and opens the object. And then finally, when
we write out the result, we may send bytes straight from disk, but only
after having unnecessarily uncompressed and computed the sha1 of the
object twice!
This patch teaches both code paths to use the new SKIP_HASH_CHECK flag
for parse_object(). You can see the speed-up in p5600, which does a
blob:none clone followed by a checkout. The savings for git.git are
modest:
Test HEAD^ HEAD
----------------------------------------------------------------------
5600.3: checkout of result 2.23(4.19+0.24) 1.72(3.79+0.18) -22.9%
But the savings scale with the number of bytes. So on a repository like
linux.git with more files, we see more improvement (in both absolute and
relative numbers):
Test HEAD^ HEAD
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
5600.3: checkout of result 51.62(77.26+2.76) 34.86(61.41+2.63) -32.5%
And here's an even more extreme case. This is the android gradle-plugin
repository, whose tip checkout has ~3.7GB of files:
Test HEAD^ HEAD
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
5600.3: checkout of result 79.51(90.84+5.55) 40.28(51.88+5.67) -49.3%
Keep in mind that these timings are of the whole checkout operation. So
they count the client indexing the pack and actually writing out the
files. If we want to see just the server's view, we can hack up the
GIT_TRACE_PACKET output from those operations and replay it via
upload-pack. For the gradle example, that gives me:
Benchmark 1: GIT_PROTOCOL=version=2 git.old upload-pack ../gradle-plugin <input
Time (mean ± σ): 50.884 s ± 0.239 s [User: 51.450 s, System: 1.726 s]
Range (min … max): 50.608 s … 51.025 s 3 runs
Benchmark 2: GIT_PROTOCOL=version=2 git.new upload-pack ../gradle-plugin <input
Time (mean ± σ): 9.728 s ± 0.112 s [User: 10.466 s, System: 1.535 s]
Range (min … max): 9.618 s … 9.842 s 3 runs
Summary
'GIT_PROTOCOL=version=2 git.new upload-pack ../gradle-plugin <input' ran
5.23 ± 0.07 times faster than 'GIT_PROTOCOL=version=2 git.old upload-pack ../gradle-plugin <input'
So a server would see an 80% reduction in CPU serving the initial
checkout of a partial clone for this repository. Or possibly even more
depending on the packing; most of the time spent in the faster one were
objects we had to open during the write phase.
In both cases skipping the extra hashing on the server should be pretty
safe. The client doesn't trust the server anyway, so it will re-hash all
of the objects via index-pack. There is one thing to note, though: the
change in get_reference() affects not just pack-objects, but rev-list,
git-log, etc. We could use a flag to limit to index-pack here, but we
may already skip hash checks in this instance. For commits, we'd skip
anything we load via the commit-graph. And while before this commit we
would check a blob fed directly to rev-list on the command-line, we'd
skip checking that same blob if we found it by traversing a tree.
The exception for both is if --verify-objects is used. In that case,
we'll skip this optimization, and the new test makes sure we do this
correctly.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
The parse_object() function checks the object hash of any object it
parses. This is a nice feature, as it means we may catch bit corruption
during normal use, rather than waiting for specific fsck operations.
But it also can be slow. It's particularly noticeable for blobs, where
except for the hash check, we could return without loading the object
contents at all. Now one may wonder what is the point of calling
parse_object() on a blob in the first place then, but usually it's not
intentional: we were fed an oid from somewhere, don't know the type, and
want an object struct. For commits and trees, the parsing is usually
helpful; we're about to look at the contents anyway. But this is less
true for blobs, where we may be collecting them as part of a
reachability traversal, etc, and don't actually care what's in them. And
blobs, of course, tend to be larger.
We don't want to just throw out the hash-checks for blobs, though. We do
depend on them in some circumstances (e.g., rev-list --verify-objects
uses parse_object() to check them). It's only the callers that know
how they're going to use the result. And so we can help them by
providing a special flag to skip the hash check.
We could just apply this to blobs, as they're going to be the main
source of performance improvement. But if a caller doesn't care about
checking the hash, we might as well skip it for other object types, too.
Even though we can't avoid reading the object contents, we can still
skip the actual hash computation.
If this seems like it is making Git a little bit less safe against
corruption, it may be. But it's part of a series of tradeoffs we're
already making. For instance, "rev-list --objects" does not open the
contents of blobs it prints. And when a commit graph is present, we skip
opening most commits entirely. The important thing will be to use this
flag in cases where it's safe to skip the check. For instance, when
serving a pack for a fetch, we know the client will fully index the
objects and do a connectivity check itself. There's little to be gained
from the server side re-hashing a blob itself. And indeed, most of the
time we don't! The revision machinery won't open up a blob reached by
traversal, but only one requested directly with a "want" line. So
applied properly, this new feature shouldn't make anything less safe in
practice.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Update the "unknown subcommand" error message in 'git notes' and 'git
remote' to wrap the offending argument between `', to make it
consistent with the "unknown switch/option/subcommand" error messages
in parse-options.
Signed-off-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
'git notes' has a default operation mode, but when invoked without a
subcommand it doesn't accept any arguments (although the 'list'
subcommand implementing the default operation mode does accept
arguments). The condition checking this ended up a bit awkward, so
let's make it clearer.
Signed-off-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
The preferred style is '!argc' instead of 'argc == 0'.
Signed-off-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
We would like to eventually use for loop initial declarations in our
codebase, but we are not there yet.
Signed-off-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Add a CONFIGURATION section to the documentation of various built-ins,
for those cases where the relevant config/NAME.txt doesn't map only to
one git-NAME.txt. In particular:
* config/blame.txt: used by git-{blame,annotate}.txt. Since the
git-annotate(1) documentation refers to git-blame(1) don't add a
"CONFIGURATION" section to git-annotate(1), only to git-blame(1).
* config/checkout.txt: maps to both git-checkout.txt and
git-switch.txt (but nothing else).
* config/init.txt: should be included in git-init(1) and
git-clone(1).
* config/column.txt: We should ideally mention the relevant subset of
this in git-{branch,clean,status,tag}.txt, but let's punt on it for
now. We will when we eventually split these sort of files into
e.g. config/column.txt and
config/column/{branch,clean,status,tag}.txt, with the former
including the latter set.
Things that are being left out, and why:
* config/{remote,remotes,credential}.txt: Configuration that affects
how we talk to remote repositories is harder to untangle. We'll need
to include some of this in git-{fetch,remote,push,ls-remote}.txt
etc., but some of those only use a small subset of these
options. Let's leave this for now.
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Matheus Tavares <matheus.bernardino@usp.br>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Add a CONFIGURATION section to the documentation of various built-ins,
for those cases where the relevant config/NAME.txt describes
configuration that is only used by the relevant built-in documented in
git-NAME.txt. Subsequent commits will handle more complex cases.
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Matheus Tavares <matheus.bernardino@usp.br>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Matheus Tavares <matheus.bernardino@usp.br>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Include the "config/difftool.txt" file in "git-difftool.txt", and move
the relevant part of git-difftool(1) configuration from
"config/diff.txt" to config/difftool.txt".
Doing this is slightly odd, as we usually discuss configuration in
alphabetical order, but by doing it we're able to include the full set
of configuration used by git-difftool(1) (and only that configuration)
in its own documentation.
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Matheus Tavares <matheus.bernardino@usp.br>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Combine the various "notes" configuration sections spread across
Documentation/config/notes.txt and Documentation/git-notes.txt to live
in the former, and to be included in the latter.
We'll now forward link from "git notes" to the "CONFIGURATION" section
below, rather than to "git-config(1)" when discussing configuration
variables that are (also) discussed in that section.
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Matheus Tavares <matheus.bernardino@usp.br>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
The wording is not identical to Documentation/config/apply.txt, but
that version is better.
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Matheus Tavares <matheus.bernardino@usp.br>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
De-duplicate the discussion of "send-email" configuration, such that
the "git-config(1)" manual page becomes the source of truth, and
"git-send-email(1)" includes the relevant part.
Most commands that suffered from such duplication had diverging text
discussing the same variables, but in this case some config was also
only discussed in one or the other.
This is mostly a move-only change, the exception is a minor rewording
of changing wording like "see above" to "see linkgit:git-config[1]",
as well as a clarification about the big section of command-line
option tweaking config being discussed in git-send-email(1)'s main
docs.
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Matheus Tavares <matheus.bernardino@usp.br>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Include the "config/grep.txt" file in "git-grep.txt", instead of
repeating an almost identical description of the "grep" configuration
variables in two places.
There is no loss of information here that isn't shown in the addition
to "grep.txt". This change was made by copying the contents of
"git-grep.txt"'s version over the "grep.txt" version. Aside from the
change "grep.txt" being made here the two were identical.
This documentation started being copy/pasted around in
b22520a37c8 (grep: allow -E and -n to be turned on by default via
configuration, 2011-03-30). After that in e.g. 6453f7b3486 (grep: add
grep.fullName config variable, 2014-03-17) they started drifting
apart, with only grep.fullName being described in the command
documentation.
In 434e6e753fe (config.txt: move grep.* to a separate file,
2018-10-27) we gained the include, but didn't do this next step, let's
do it now.
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Matheus Tavares <matheus.bernardino@usp.br>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
In b6a8d09f6d8 (gc docs: include the "gc.*" section from "config" in
"gc", 2019-04-07) the "git gc" documentation was made to include the
config/gc.txt in its "CONFIGURATION" section. We do that in several
other places, but "git gc" was the only one with a blurb above the
include to orient the reader.
We don't want readers to carefully scrutinize "git-config(1)" and
"git-gc(1)" looking for discrepancies, instead we should tell them
that the latter includes a part of the former.
This change formalizes that wording in two new templates to be
included, one for the "git gc" case where the entire section is
included from "git-config(1)", and another for when the inclusion of
"git-config(1)" follows discussion unique to that documentation. In
order to use that re-arrange the order of those being discussed in the
"git-merge(1)" documentation.
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Matheus Tavares <matheus.bernardino@usp.br>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Since the point of --verify-objects is to actually load and checksum the
bytes of each object, optimizing out reads using the commit graph runs
contrary to our goal.
The most targeted way to implement this would be for the revision
traversal code to check revs->verify_objects and avoid using the commit
graph. But it's difficult to be sure we've hit all of the correct spots.
For instance, I started this patch by writing the first of the included
test cases, where the corrupted commit is directly on rev-list's command
line. And that is easy to fix by teaching get_reference() to check
revs->verify_objects before calling lookup_commit_in_graph().
But that doesn't cover the second test case: when we traverse to a
corrupted commit, we'd parse the parent in process_parents(). So we'd
need to check there, too. And it keeps going. In handle_commit() we
sometimes parses commits, too, though I couldn't figure out a way to
trigger it that did not already parse via get_reference() or tag
peeling. And try_to_simplify_commit() has its own parse call, and so on.
So it seems like the safest thing is to just disable the commit graph
for the whole process when we see the --verify-objects option. We can do
that either in builtin/rev-list.c, where we use the option, or in
revision.c, where we parse it. There are some subtleties:
- putting it in rev-list.c is less surprising in some ways, because
there we know we are just doing a single traversal. In a command
which does multiple traversals in a single process, it's rather
unexpected to globally disable the commit graph.
- putting it in revision.c is less surprising in some ways, because
the caller does not have to remember to disable the graph
themselves. But this is already tricky! The verify_objects flag in
rev_info doesn't do anything by itself. The caller has to provide an
object callback which does the right thing.
- for that reason, in practice nobody but rev-list uses this option in
the first place. So the distinction is probably not important either
way. Arguably it should just be an option of rev-list, and not the
general revision machinery; right now you can run "git log
--verify-objects", but it does not actually do anything useful.
- checking for a parsed revs.verify_objects flag in rev-list.c is too
late. By that time we've already passed the arguments to
setup_revisions(), which will have parsed the commits using the
graph.
So this commit disables the graph as soon as we see the option in
revision.c. That's a pretty broad hammer, but it does what we want, and
in practice nobody but rev-list is using this flag anyway.
The tests cover both the "tip" and "parent" cases. Obviously our hammer
hits them both in this case, but it's good to check both in case
somebody later tries the more focused approach.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Reviewed-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
We exit early from lookup_commit_in_graph() if the commit_graph pointer
is NULL, under the assumption that we don't have a graph to look at. But
the graph pointer is lazy-loaded; if no other code happens to have
called prepare_commit_graph(), we'll incorrectly assume that one isn't
available at all.
This has a pretty small performance impact in practice, because the
fallback will generally be to call parse_object() instead. That ends up
in parse_commit_buffer(), which loads the graph data itself. So the
first commit we see won't use the graph, but subsequent ones will. Since
using the graph is just an optimization there's generally no
user-visible difference, but if you instrument rev-list like so:
diff --git a/revision.c b/revision.c
index ee702e498a..63c488ffb6 100644
--- a/revision.c
+++ b/revision.c
@@ -381,6 +381,9 @@ static struct object *get_reference(struct rev_info *revs, const char *name,
* parsing commit data from disk.
*/
commit = lookup_commit_in_graph(revs->repo, oid);
+ warning("%s %s in commit graph",
+ commit ? "found" : "did not find",
+ name);
if (commit)
object = &commit->object;
else
and run (in git.git):
git commit-graph write --reachable
git rev-list origin/master origin/next >/dev/null
you'll see that we fail to find the first one:
warning: did not find origin/master in commit graph
warning: found origin/next in commit graph
After this patch, you'll see that we find both:
warning: found origin/master in commit graph
warning: found origin/next in commit graph
Even though the performance implication is small here, there are two
important reasons to do this:
- it's downright confusing if you are hunting a bug triggered by the
use of the commit graph. It may or may not trigger depending on the
number and ordering of tips you ask for.
- prepare_commit_graph() has other policy logic, too. In particular,
if we've loaded a commit graph and then disabled the graph via
disable_commit_graph(), that should take precedence.
I'm not sure if this can trigger bad behavior in practice. The only
caller there is upload-pack's deepen_by_rev_list(), which should be
avoiding the commit graph for its traversal tips, but probably
wasn't before this patch. Whether you could come up with a case
where that mattered is unclear. Still, this is obviously the right
thing to be doing.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Reviewed-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Include 'Documentation/technical/scalar.txt' alongside the other HTML
technical docs when installing them.
Now that the document is intended as a widely-accessible reference, remove
the internal work-in-progress roadmap from the document. Those details
should no longer be needed to guide Scalar's development and, if they were
left, they could fall out-of-date and be misleading to readers.
Signed-off-by: Victoria Dye <vdye@github.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
