| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
Change all Email to E-Mail, as this is the correct form in German.
Signed-off-by: Phillip Sz <phillip.szelat@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ralf Thielow <ralf.thielow@gmail.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Ralf Thielow <ralf.thielow@gmail.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Current syntax description makes one wonder if there is any
syntactic way to distinguish between <branch> and <upstream> so that
one can specify <branch> but not <upstream>, but that is not the
case.
Make it explicit that these arguments are positional, i.e. the
earlier ones cannot be omitted if you want to give later ones.
Signed-off-by: Sergey Organov <sorganov@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Ralf Thielow <ralf.thielow@gmail.com>
|
|
Translate 38 new messages came from git.pot update in fe05e19
(l10n: git.pot: v2.1.0 round 1 (38 new, 9 removed)).
Signed-off-by: Ralf Thielow <ralf.thielow@gmail.com>
|
|
The implementation sends an LF, but the protocol documentation was
missing this detail.
Signed-off-by: Shawn Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
twoway_merge() is missing an o->gently check in the case where a file
that needs to be modified is missing from the index but present in the
old and new trees. As a result, in this case 'git checkout -m' errors
out instead of trying to perform a merge.
Fix it by checking o->gently. While at it, inline the o->gently check
into reject_merge to prevent future call sites from making the same
mistake.
Noticed by code inspection. The test for the motivating case was
added by JC.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Since dd0b72c (bash prompt: use bash builtins to check stash
state, 2011-04-01), git-prompt checks whether we have a
stash by looking for $GIT_DIR/refs/stash. Generally external
programs should never do this, because they would miss
packed-refs.
That commit claims that packed-refs does not pack
refs/stash, but that is not quite true. It does pack the
ref, but due to a bug, fails to prune the ref. When we fix
that bug, we would want to be doing the right thing here.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Reviewed-by: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: Ronnie Sahlberg <sahlberg@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
When creating a new annotated tag, we sprintf the refname
into a static-sized buffer. If we have an absurdly long
tagname, like:
git init repo &&
cd repo &&
git commit --allow-empty -m foo &&
git tag -m message mytag &&
git fast-export mytag |
perl -lpe '/^tag/ and s/mytag/"a" x 8192/e' |
git fast-import <input
we'll overflow the buffer. We can fix it by using a strbuf.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Reviewed-by: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: Ronnie Sahlberg <sahlberg@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
We have a global pointer pack_data pointing to the current
pack we have open. Inside end_packfile we have two new
pointers, old_p and new_p. The latter points to pack_data,
and the former points to the new "installed" version of the
packfile we get when we hand the file off to the regular
sha1_file machinery. When then free old_p.
Presumably the extra old_p pointer was there so that we
could overwrite pack_data with new_p and still free old_p,
but we don't do that. We just leave pack_data pointing to
bogus memory, and don't overwrite it until we call
start_packfile again (if ever).
This can cause problems for our die routine, which calls
end_packfile to clean things up. If we die at the wrong
moment, we can end up looking at invalid memory in
pack_data left after the last end_packfile().
Instead, let's make sure we set pack_data to NULL after we
free it, and make calling endfile() again with a NULL
pack_data a noop (there is nothing to end).
We can further make things less confusing by dropping old_p
entirely, and moving new_p closer to its point of use.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Reviewed-by: Ronnie Sahlberg <sahlberg@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
After we have packed all refs, we prune any loose refs that
correspond to what we packed. We do so by first taking a
lock with lock_ref_sha1, and then deleting the loose ref
file.
However, lock_ref_sha1 will refuse to take a lock on any
refs that exist at the top-level of the "refs/" directory,
and we skip pruning the ref. This is almost certainly not
what we want to happen here. The criteria to be pruned
should not differ from that to be packed; if a ref makes it
to prune_ref, it's because we want it both packed and
pruned (if there are refs you do not want to be packed, they
should be omitted much earlier by pack_ref_is_possible,
which we do in this case if --all is not given).
We can fix this by switching to lock_any_ref_for_update.
This behaves exactly the same with the exception of this
top-level check.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Reviewed-by: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: Ronnie Sahlberg <sahlberg@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Suggested-by: Stefan Beller <stefanbeller@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ralf Thielow <ralf.thielow@gmail.com>
|
|
Reported-by: Hartmut Henkel
Signed-off-by: Ralf Thielow <ralf.thielow@gmail.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Alex Henrie <alexhenrie24@gmail.com>
|
