| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The sorting in iio_gts_build_avail_time_table is not working as intended.
It could result in an out-of-bounds access when the time is zero.
Here are more details:
1. When the gts->itime_table[i].time_us is zero, e.g., the time
sequence is `3, 0, 1`, the inner for-loop will not terminate and do
out-of-bound writes. This is because once `times[j] > new`, the value
`new` will be added in the current position and the `times[j]` will be
moved to `j+1` position, which makes the if-condition always hold.
Meanwhile, idx will be added one, making the loop keep running without
termination and out-of-bound write.
2. If none of the gts->itime_table[i].time_us is zero, the elements
will just be copied without being sorted as described in the comment
"Sort times from all tables to one and remove duplicates".
For more details, please refer to
https://lore.kernel.org/all/6dd0d822-046c-4dd2-9532-79d7ab96ec05@gmail.com.
Reported-by: Chenyuan Yang <chenyuan0y@gmail.com>
Suggested-by: Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@gmail.com>
Fixes: 38416c28e168 ("iio: light: Add gain-time-scale helpers")
Signed-off-by: Chenyuan Yang <chenyuan0y@gmail.com>
Co-developed-by: Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/d501ade8c1f7b202d34c6404eda423489cab1df5.1714480171.git.mazziesaccount@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The loop based 64bit division may run for a long time when dividend is a
lot bigger than the divider. Replace the division loop by the
div64_u64() which implementation may be significantly faster.
Tested-by: Subhajit Ghosh <subhajit.ghosh@tweaklogic.com>
Signed-off-by: Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@gmail.com>
Fixes: 38416c28e168 ("iio: light: Add gain-time-scale helpers")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/Zcn-6e-0-nh2WcfU@drtxq0yyyyyyyyyyyyyby-3.rev.dnainternet.fi
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The IIO ABI mandates expressing integration times in seconds. The GTS
helper errorneously uses micro seconds in integration_times_available.
Fix this by converting the lists to IIO_VAL_INT_PLUS_MICRO.
Fixes: 38416c28e168 ("iio: light: Add gain-time-scale helpers")
Signed-off-by: Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/eeacd192c259e885850b5a2dd8b776bccfc44fa8.1681722914.git.mazziesaccount@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
|
|
|
Some light sensors can adjust both the HW-gain and integration time.
There are cases where adjusting the integration time has similar impact
to the scale of the reported values as gain setting has.
IIO users do typically expect to handle scale by a single writable 'scale'
entry. Driver should then adjust the gain/time accordingly.
It however is difficult for a driver to know whether it should change
gain or integration time to meet the requested scale. Usually it is
preferred to have longer integration time which usually improves
accuracy, but there may be use-cases where long measurement times can be
an issue. Thus it can be preferable to allow also changing the
integration time - but mitigate the scale impact by also changing the gain
underneath. Eg, if integration time change doubles the measured values,
the driver can reduce the HW-gain to half.
The theory of the computations of gain-time-scale is simple. However,
some people (undersigned) got that implemented wrong for more than once.
Add some gain-time-scale helpers in order to not dublicate errors in all
drivers needing these computations.
Signed-off-by: Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/268d418e7cffcdaa2ece6738478bbc57692c213e.1680263956.git.mazziesaccount@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
|
