summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/src/resolve/resolved-dns-trust-anchor.h (follow)
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* license: LGPL-2.1+ -> LGPL-2.1-or-laterYu Watanabe2020-11-091-1/+1
|
* tree-wide: remove Lennart's copyright linesLennart Poettering2018-06-141-4/+0
| | | | | | | | | | | These lines are generally out-of-date, incomplete and unnecessary. With SPDX and git repository much more accurate and fine grained information about licensing and authorship is available, hence let's drop the per-file copyright notice. Of course, removing copyright lines of others is problematic, hence this commit only removes my own lines and leaves all others untouched. It might be nicer if sooner or later those could go away too, making git the only and accurate source of authorship information.
* tree-wide: drop 'This file is part of systemd' blurbLennart Poettering2018-06-141-2/+0
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This part of the copyright blurb stems from the GPL use recommendations: https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-howto.en.html The concept appears to originate in times where version control was per file, instead of per tree, and was a way to glue the files together. Ultimately, we nowadays don't live in that world anymore, and this information is entirely useless anyway, as people are very welcome to copy these files into any projects they like, and they shouldn't have to change bits that are part of our copyright header for that. hence, let's just get rid of this old cruft, and shorten our codebase a bit.
* tree-wide: drop license boilerplateZbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek2018-04-061-13/+0
| | | | | | | | | | Files which are installed as-is (any .service and other unit files, .conf files, .policy files, etc), are left as is. My assumption is that SPDX identifiers are not yet that well known, so it's better to retain the extended header to avoid any doubt. I also kept any copyright lines. We can probably remove them, but it'd nice to obtain explicit acks from all involved authors before doing that.
* Add SPDX license identifiers to source files under the LGPLZbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek2017-11-191-0/+1
| | | | | This follows what the kernel is doing, c.f. https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=5fd54ace4721fc5ce2bb5aef6318fcf17f421460.
* tree-wide: remove Emacs lines from all filesDaniel Mack2016-02-101-2/+0
| | | | | This should be handled fine now by .dir-locals.el, so need to carry that stuff in every file.
* resolved: when validating, first strip revoked trust anchor keys from ↵Lennart Poettering2016-01-111-0/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | validated keys list When validating a transaction we initially collect DNSKEY, DS, SOA RRs in the "validated_keys" list, that we need for the proofs. This includes DNSKEY and DS data from our trust anchor database. Quite possibly we learn that some of these DNSKEY/DS RRs have been revoked between the time we request and collect those additional RRs and we begin the validation step. In this case we need to make sure that the respective DS/DNSKEY RRs are removed again from our list. This patch adds that, and strips known revoked trust anchor RRs from the validated list before we begin the actual validation proof, and each time we add more DNSKEY material to it while we are doing the proof.
* resolved: rework trust anchor revoke checkingLennart Poettering2016-01-111-1/+1
| | | | | | | | Instead of first iterating through all DNSKEYs in the DnsAnswer in dns_transaction_check_revoked_trust_anchors(), and then doing that a second time in dns_trust_anchor_check_revoked(), do so only once in the former, and pass the dnskey we found directly to the latter.
* resolved: partially implement RFC5011 Trust Anchor supportLennart Poettering2016-01-041-0/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | With this patch resolved will properly handle revoked keys, but not augment the locally configured trust anchor database with newly learned keys. Specifically, resolved now refuses validating RRsets with revoked keys, and it will remove revoked keys from the configured trust anchors (only until reboot). This patch does not add logic for adding new keys to the set of trust anchors. This is a deliberate decision as this only can work with persistent disk storage, and would result in a different update logic for stateful and stateless systems. Since we have to support stateless systems anyway, and don't want to encourage two independent upgrade paths we focus on upgrading the trust anchor database via the usual OS upgrade logic. Whenever a trust anchor entry is found revoked and removed from the trust anchor a recognizable log message is written, encouraging the user to update the trust anchor or update his operating system.
* resolved: add negative trust anchro support, and add trust anchor ↵Lennart Poettering2016-01-031-2/+4
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | configuration files This adds negative trust anchor support and allows reading trust anchor data from disk, from files /etc/systemd/dnssec-trust-anchors.d/*.positive and /etc/systemd/dnssec-trust-anchros.d/*.negative, as well as the matching counterparts in /usr/lib and /run. The positive trust anchor files are more or less compatible to normal DNS zone files containing DNSKEY and DS RRs. The negative trust anchor files contain only new-line separated hostnames for which to require no signing. By default no trust anchor files are installed, in which case the compiled-in root domain DS RR is used, as before. As soon as at least one positive root anchor for the root is defined via trust anchor files this buil-in DS RR is not added though.
* resolved: add a simple trust anchor database as additional RR sourceLennart Poettering2015-12-031-0/+39
When doing DNSSEC lookups we need to know one or more DS or DNSKEY RRs as trust anchors to validate lookups. With this change we add a compiled-in trust anchor database, serving the root DS key as of today, retrieved from: https://data.iana.org/root-anchors/root-anchors.xml The interface is kept generic, so that additional DS or DNSKEY RRs may be served via the same interface, for example by provisioning them locally in external files to support "islands" of security. The trust anchor database becomes the fourth source of RRs we maintain, besides, the network, the local cache, and the local zone.