summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/drivers
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorMasahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>2018-01-17 17:28:08 +0100
committerUlf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>2018-03-05 09:08:51 +0100
commit3ca1507b5b3bba2a7d610659fb93c666282f83e5 (patch)
treeb52bbff049a72167e486c300d11e9d76040d1ddb /drivers
parentmmc: renesas_sdhi: use MMC_CAP2_NO_WRITE_PROTECT instead of TMIO own flag (diff)
downloadlinux-3ca1507b5b3bba2a7d610659fb93c666282f83e5.tar.xz
linux-3ca1507b5b3bba2a7d610659fb93c666282f83e5.zip
sh: kfr2r09: use MMC_CAP2_NO_WRITE_PROTECT instead of TMIO own flag
TMIO_MMC_WRPROTECT_DISABLE is equivalent to MMC_CAP2_NO_WRITE_PROTECT. The flag is propagated as follows: tmio_mmc_data::capabilities2 -> mmc_host::caps2 Only the difference is the TMIO_... makes tmio_mmc_get_ro() return 0 (i.e. it does not affect mmc_gpio_get_ro() at all), while MMC_CAP2_... returns 0 before calling ->get_ro() hook (i.e. it affects both IP own logic and GPIO detection). The TMIO MMC drivers do not set-up gpio_ro by themselves, so gpio_ro is obviously unused by legacy boards like this. So, this conversion should be safe. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> Reviewed-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com> Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Tested-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions