sched/cpufreq, sched/uclamp: Add clamps for FAIR and RT tasks

Each time a frequency update is required via schedutil, a frequency is
selected to (possibly) satisfy the utilization reported by each
scheduling class and irqs. However, when utilization clamping is in use,
the frequency selection should consider userspace utilization clamping
hints.  This will allow, for example, to:

 - boost tasks which are directly affecting the user experience
   by running them at least at a minimum "requested" frequency

 - cap low priority tasks not directly affecting the user experience
   by running them only up to a maximum "allowed" frequency

These constraints are meant to support a per-task based tuning of the
frequency selection thus supporting a fine grained definition of
performance boosting vs energy saving strategies in kernel space.

Add support to clamp the utilization of RUNNABLE FAIR and RT tasks
within the boundaries defined by their aggregated utilization clamp
constraints.

Do that by considering the max(min_util, max_util) to give boosted tasks
the performance they need even when they happen to be co-scheduled with
other capped tasks.

Signed-off-by: Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Alessio Balsini <balsini@android.com>
Cc: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Cc: Joel Fernandes <joelaf@google.com>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>
Cc: Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@arm.com>
Cc: Rafael J . Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Cc: Steve Muckle <smuckle@google.com>
Cc: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Todd Kjos <tkjos@google.com>
Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190621084217.8167-10-patrick.bellasi@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

1 files changed, 12 insertions, 3 deletions

diff --git a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
index 7c4ce69067c4..d84e036a7536 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
@@ -202,8 +202,10 @@ unsigned long schedutil_freq_util(int cpu, unsigned long util_cfs,
 	unsigned long dl_util, util, irq;
 	struct rq *rq = cpu_rq(cpu);
 
-	if (type == FREQUENCY_UTIL && rt_rq_is_runnable(&rq->rt))
+	if (!IS_BUILTIN(CONFIG_UCLAMP_TASK) &&
+	    type == FREQUENCY_UTIL && rt_rq_is_runnable(&rq->rt)) {
 		return max;
+	}
 
 	/*
 	 * Early check to see if IRQ/steal time saturates the CPU, can be
@@ -219,9 +221,16 @@ unsigned long schedutil_freq_util(int cpu, unsigned long util_cfs,
 	 * CFS tasks and we use the same metric to track the effective
 	 * utilization (PELT windows are synchronized) we can directly add them
 	 * to obtain the CPU's actual utilization.
+	 *
+	 * CFS and RT utilization can be boosted or capped, depending on
+	 * utilization clamp constraints requested by currently RUNNABLE
+	 * tasks.
+	 * When there are no CFS RUNNABLE tasks, clamps are released and
+	 * frequency will be gracefully reduced with the utilization decay.
 	 */
-	util = util_cfs;
-	util += cpu_util_rt(rq);
+	util = util_cfs + cpu_util_rt(rq);
+	if (type == FREQUENCY_UTIL)
+		util = uclamp_util(rq, util);
 
 	dl_util = cpu_util_dl(rq);