mm: kmem: add lockdep assertion to obj_cgroup_memcg

obj_cgroup_memcg() is supposed to safe to prevent the returned memory
cgroup from being freed only when the caller is holding the rcu read lock
or objcg_lock or cgroup_mutex.  It is very easy to ignore thoes conditions
when users call some upper APIs which call obj_cgroup_memcg() internally
like mem_cgroup_from_slab_obj() (See the link below).  So it is better to
add lockdep assertion to obj_cgroup_memcg() to find those issues ASAP.

Because there is no user of obj_cgroup_memcg() holding objcg_lock to make
the returned memory cgroup safe, do not add objcg_lock assertion (We
should export objcg_lock if we really want to do).  Additionally, this is
some internal implementation detail of memcg and should not be accessible
outside memcg code.

Some users like __mem_cgroup_uncharge() do not care the lifetime of the
returned memory cgroup, which just want to know if the folio is charged to
a memory cgroup, therefore, they do not need to hold the needed locks.  In
which case, introduce a new helper folio_memcg_charged() to do this. 
Compare it to folio_memcg(), it could eliminate a memory access of
objcg->memcg for kmem, actually, a really small gain.

[songmuchun@bytedance.com: fix split_page_memcg()]
  Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240819080415.44964-1-songmuchun@bytedance.com
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240718083607.42068-1-songmuchun@bytedance.com/
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240814093415.17634-1-songmuchun@bytedance.com
Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Acked-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>
Acked-by: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>

1 files changed, 5 insertions, 6 deletions

diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index cb2996d5d3f4..96f85fd0e5b3 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -2374,7 +2374,7 @@ void mem_cgroup_cancel_charge(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, unsigned int nr_pages)
 
 static void commit_charge(struct folio *folio, struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
 {
-	VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO(folio_memcg(folio), folio);
+	VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO(folio_memcg_charged(folio), folio);
 	/*
 	 * Any of the following ensures page's memcg stability:
 	 *
@@ -3035,12 +3035,11 @@ void __memcg_slab_free_hook(struct kmem_cache *s, struct slab *slab,
 void split_page_memcg(struct page *head, int old_order, int new_order)
 {
 	struct folio *folio = page_folio(head);
-	struct mem_cgroup *memcg = folio_memcg(folio);
 	int i;
 	unsigned int old_nr = 1 << old_order;
 	unsigned int new_nr = 1 << new_order;
 
-	if (mem_cgroup_disabled() || !memcg)
+	if (mem_cgroup_disabled() || !folio_memcg_charged(folio))
 		return;
 
 	for (i = new_nr; i < old_nr; i += new_nr)
@@ -3049,7 +3048,7 @@ void split_page_memcg(struct page *head, int old_order, int new_order)
 	if (folio_memcg_kmem(folio))
 		obj_cgroup_get_many(__folio_objcg(folio), old_nr / new_nr - 1);
 	else
-		css_get_many(&memcg->css, old_nr / new_nr - 1);
+		css_get_many(&folio_memcg(folio)->css, old_nr / new_nr - 1);
 }
 
 unsigned long mem_cgroup_usage(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, bool swap)
@@ -4707,7 +4706,7 @@ void __mem_cgroup_uncharge(struct folio *folio)
 	struct uncharge_gather ug;
 
 	/* Don't touch folio->lru of any random page, pre-check: */
-	if (!folio_memcg(folio))
+	if (!folio_memcg_charged(folio))
 		return;
 
 	uncharge_gather_clear(&ug);
@@ -4752,7 +4751,7 @@ void mem_cgroup_replace_folio(struct folio *old, struct folio *new)
 		return;
 
 	/* Page cache replacement: new folio already charged? */
-	if (folio_memcg(new))
+	if (folio_memcg_charged(new))
 		return;
 
 	memcg = folio_memcg(old);