rust: add safety comment in workqueue traits

Add missing safety comments for the implementation of the unsafe traits
WorkItemPointer and RawWorkItem for Arc<T> in workqueue.rs

Link: https://github.com/Rust-for-Linux/linux/issues/351.
Co-developed-by: Vangelis Mamalakis <mamalakis@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Vangelis Mamalakis <mamalakis@google.com>
Suggested-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Konstantin Andrikopoulos <kernel@mandragore.io>
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>

1 files changed, 16 insertions, 2 deletions

diff --git a/rust/kernel/workqueue.rs b/rust/kernel/workqueue.rs
index 4d1d2062f6eb..fd3e97192ed8 100644
--- a/rust/kernel/workqueue.rs
+++ b/rust/kernel/workqueue.rs
@@ -519,7 +519,15 @@ impl_has_work! {
     impl{T} HasWork<Self> for ClosureWork<T> { self.work }
 }
 
-// SAFETY: TODO.
+// SAFETY: The `__enqueue` implementation in RawWorkItem uses a `work_struct` initialized with the
+// `run` method of this trait as the function pointer because:
+//   - `__enqueue` gets the `work_struct` from the `Work` field, using `T::raw_get_work`.
+//   - The only safe way to create a `Work` object is through `Work::new`.
+//   - `Work::new` makes sure that `T::Pointer::run` is passed to `init_work_with_key`.
+//   - Finally `Work` and `RawWorkItem` guarantee that the correct `Work` field
+//     will be used because of the ID const generic bound. This makes sure that `T::raw_get_work`
+//     uses the correct offset for the `Work` field, and `Work::new` picks the correct
+//     implementation of `WorkItemPointer` for `Arc<T>`.
 unsafe impl<T, const ID: u64> WorkItemPointer<ID> for Arc<T>
 where
     T: WorkItem<ID, Pointer = Self>,
@@ -537,7 +545,13 @@ where
     }
 }
 
-// SAFETY: TODO.
+// SAFETY: The `work_struct` raw pointer is guaranteed to be valid for the duration of the call to
+// the closure because we get it from an `Arc`, which means that the ref count will be at least 1,
+// and we don't drop the `Arc` ourselves. If `queue_work_on` returns true, it is further guaranteed
+// to be valid until a call to the function pointer in `work_struct` because we leak the memory it
+// points to, and only reclaim it if the closure returns false, or in `WorkItemPointer::run`, which
+// is what the function pointer in the `work_struct` must be pointing to, according to the safety
+// requirements of `WorkItemPointer`.
 unsafe impl<T, const ID: u64> RawWorkItem<ID> for Arc<T>
 where
     T: WorkItem<ID, Pointer = Self>,